, "Thomas Koch" wrote:
> Boris Ribalkin:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > I did some improvements to mdh related to non interactive mode:
> >
> > 1. Package version defaults to maven version.
> > 2. ignore-missing flag Introduced to ignore not needed librar
Hi Thomas,
I did some improvements to mdh related to non interactive mode:
1. Package version defaults to maven version.
2. ignore-missing flag Introduced to ignore not needed libraries to be able
to continue and see if build fails.
3. mh_make skip test / doc flag fixes.
4. Default licence versio
If you do not have time here is the patch attached to fix that build error.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Boris Ribalkin wrote:
> Forgot to cc the list.
>
>
> -- Forwarded message ------
> From: Boris Ribalkin
> Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:18 AM
> Su
Forgot to cc the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Boris Ribalkin
Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:18 AM
Subject: Re: Maven auto packager idea
To: Thomas Koch
Hi Thomas,
I've tried to build them, repo helper was fine, but debian helper gave the
following exception:
co
Hi Thomas,
Could you point me to the sources/binaries, so I can get the idea of what
exactly to expect?
Thanks.
On Mar 13, 2013 8:02 AM, "Thomas Koch" wrote:
> Boris Ribalkin:
> > The main blocker right now is mh_make which is very interactive, but I
> need
> > i
Hi,
While developing maven based open source tool I decided to have my own
launchpad ppa and package all missing dependencies the right Debian way
using maven debian helper ( mh_make ). It's was a nice tool to start as I
never packaged anything for Debian. But after some time I realized that I
spe
Hi,
I have maven based package which depends on other packages with version
restriction (libsqljet-java (>= 1.1.1)):
Build-Depends-Indep: libmaven-replacer-plugin-java, libcommons-cli-java,
libcommons-codec-java,
libcommons-io-java, libcommons-lang-java, libgoogle-api-client-java,
libjetty-java,
/pom.xml...
> > Include the module google-http-client/pom.xml ?
> > [y]/n > y
> >
> > This is required because the parent POM located at the root of the
> > project contains important information such as the versions for the
> > dependencies. Thi
y to package version null in Debian.
> Try again to resolve the dependency?
> [y]/n >
>
Is this because dependency has no version, but how then junit dependency is
found if it has no version as well?
What is the proper way of fixing this?
Thanks.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Boris
9 matches
Mail list logo