Resigning from the Java team

t you won't loose me as Debian Developer. You will see more uploads of audacity, vlc, and packaging tools packages from me in the future. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: eclipse (new upstream release with Java 7 support)

ithout this variable set and found no issues > anymore, so it's removed. Thanks. I am currently uploading it. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: eclipse (new upstream release with Java 7 support)

_WINDOWS=true" workaround should be dropped. For the latter please check the bug report in Ubuntu. Feel free to ping me on IRC. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Guidelines for source control management

tch isn't enough to get the source. > QUESTION: should the patches be applied or unapplied by default? I vote for unapplied by default. This makes merging new upstream releases easier. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: orphaning git-maintained packages

o the > /home/groups/pkg-java/OLDGIT/ directory on git.debian.org. I've done > that with javatar.git. Any better ideas? Maybe call that directory ORPHANED or HISTORIC instead of OLDGIT? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

UDS-o track for Eclipse 3.6

Hi, I created a blueprint [1] for Eclipse 3.6 for the Ubuntu developer summit (UDS) next week. I hope that it will attract fresh blood. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-o-eclipse-3.6/ -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This

Re: Idea for wheezy development: automatic class search tool

unstable of this jar is missing that > method, on which this and that jars are relying... > > Possibilities are countless. > > How do you like the idea ? Can we have it in a package instead? Something equivalent to command-not-found? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: libjava-gnome-java (updated package)

ends in debian/control. -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: eclipse-cdt (Fixes 3 RC bugs)

Am Freitag, den 08.10.2010, 11:10 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier: > Hi > > Benjamin Drung and I have prepared a new version of eclipse-cdt. > > eclipse-cdt (6.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream release. > - eclipse-cdt no longer quits when looking up a de

Debian Java meeting at the Mini DebConf

Hi, Let's meet today (Friday, 2010-06-11) at 11:00 (local time) at the LinuxTag in the Hacklab (New York 3). Niels Thykier and I will be there. -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signi

Re: Eclipse 3.5

eyes to review it. Currently the only > thing left on my list to do is making eclipse build against the final 6 > dependencies, repack to remove embedded jars + cleaning up > debian/copyright (removing licenses of the embedded jars). Since we have > spent 5 months now dancing with this pac

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

end on the > > swt-gtk generated packages. > > no, that's the wrong thing to do. The packages should not be built twice. if > you > have separate sources, then eclipse should *build-depend* on these packages, > and > not build them twice. Yes, that's what w

Re: munin-java-plugins package - request for review

ll of your suggetions [1]. I would recommend to change the order to "java6-runtime-headless | java5-runtime-headless", so that the default will be java6-runtime-headless. -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Descr

Re: RFH: OSGi Metadata for jars (blocks eclipse)

Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2009, 19:44 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier: > Hi > > Recently Benjamin Drung managed to make eclipse use our system jars > during the build; sadly we ran into build problems since some of these > jar files are missing the OSGi metadata that eclipse expects. Benj

Re: RFS: libcommons-collections-java 2.1.1-9

d yourself to uploaders, and the lintian > warning goes away. You should add yourself to uploaders instead of using this "workaround" if you care about this package and intent to do another upload in the future. -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil