On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 04:53:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The s390 failure may be due to too little RAM allocated to the instance
> > (on lxdebian.bfinv.de).
> tried to work around this prentending to have at least some amount of RAM
> (packages in
> experimental); the buildds may swap,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:16:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - s390: rebuilt by hand on raptor/unstable without problems.
>Bastian pointed to #479952 as a possible reason. would it
>be possible to do a test-rebuild on the machine which is
>used security updates?
Works according t
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> A security update for the OpenJDK 6 source base will require more than
> 60 hours of armel build time, and more than two weeks[1] on sparc for
> openjdk-6 alone (don't know cocoa-oj6 yet).
The fastjar changes are aimed to decrease t
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-10
Severity: important
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:34:12AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> the build failure on s390 is unexpected; is it possible to extract a
> test case?
| java: pthread_mutex_lock.c:71: __pthread_mutex_lock: Assertion
`mutex->__data.__owner == 0' fai
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:55:37PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> . raptor.d.o (s390):
> I was unable to expand the package...
When have your tried to do this? The last days raptore suffers from two
kernel bugs. The NFS server crashed with a XFS error and the NFS client
crashed with a known but
5 matches
Mail list logo
