On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> Package: vtk
> Version: 5.2.1-9
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi
>
> Please look into why vtk fails to build from source on at least the
> powerpc and sparc buildds.
>
> There are quite some java packages waiting on vtk to be able to migrate
> to testing.
>
> Cheers
Forwarded from -devel
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should
this package be orphaned?)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009
From: Ana Guerrero
To: Jerry Haltom , Michael Koch ,
Matthias Klose , Stephan Michels
On Wed, May 20
Hi
Whilst I can see that being unable to install sun-java6 from sid is
annoying, you should be able to work around it easily enough.
Depending on your exact requirements you could either install sun-java5 or
install 6-00-2 from testing, or grab 6-04-2 from
http://snapshot.debian.net/sun-jav
On Friday 04 April 2008 23:18, Gregory Stark wrote:
> Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> > Ian Bull wrote:
> > > Did you run apt-get update before that ? As far as I can see,
> > > this problems does not exist anymore.
> > >
> > > Thank for the reply Vincent.
> > >
> > > Yep, I tired an update first:
Hi
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 04:11, Matthew Johnson wrote:
[snip a lot of good stuff I agree with]
> A much better solution would be to define a better set of virtual
> packages. I would go with:
>
>- lowest common denominator (essentially the _intersection_ of Java
> 1.4 and whatever
On Sunday 25 February 2007 01:09, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Jörg Sommer writes:
> > Hi Java team,
> >
> > I've got a bug report that libgtkpeer.so is missing if gcj-4.1 is used.
> >
> > IMO this is a bug in gcj. kaffe and sablevm provide through
> > dependencies the file libgtkpeer.so.
>
> This is do
Hi
Sun-java5 1.5.0-11-1 was uploaded to unstable 25 days ago with several fixes
that would be good to see in etch [1]. (The fix for Ubuntu #71933 is
arguable RC). Are any of the maintainers planning to ask the release team
to unblock it?
If the release team aren't prepared to unblock it, (
retitle 409302 update-java-alternatives: wrong syntax in README.alternatives
clone 409302 -1
reassign 409302 sun-java5
reassign -1 sun-java6
thanks
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 15:43, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:32:24PM +0100, Nicolas DEGAND wrote:
> > After migrating from j
Package: java-common
Version: 0.25
Severity: important
Hi
I have multiple jdks installed, including gcj-4.1, sun-java5 (from non-free),
Sun and IBM java 1.4 (via sarge's java-package).
When I use update-java-alternatives --set java-gcj to switch to gjc, I get
...
Using `/usr/lib/jvm/java-gc
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 00:41, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
> Hi Jörg,
>
> > Eric Lavarde - Debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I've got a request #385190 to add the java2-runtime to the dependency
> >>> alternative of the package bootchart-view. What's the difference
> >
On Sunday 03 September 2006 05:46, you wrote:
> what neds to be to done so it hits unstable/testing?
>
I don't know, but Arnaud Vandyck (who did the packaging) is subscribed to
Debian-java, so sending your question back to back to the list.
> On 9/2/06, Andrew Vaughan <[EMAIL
On Saturday 02 September 2006 11:43, Shobhit Jindal wrote:
> hello sirs,
>
> i wos disappointed to see that tomcat from debian repository is very old
> ( 5.0..30-10) wheras tomcat5.5(presently at 5.5.17) have been released
> long time back and thus requires a major upgradation
tomcat5.5 is current
On Sunday 06 August 2006 21:45, MrDemeanour wrote:
> Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> >
> > In Sarge, Tomcat4 shipped in contrib.
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Java/ShouldGoToMain states "Works with Kaffe
> > 1.1.3 but need non-free JDK to compile (com.sun.* classes)"
>
Hi Jack
I'm have no experience running servlets, but I am using Java on Debian, and
can make a stab at some of your questions.
On Sunday 06 August 2006 00:06, MrDemeanour wrote:
> I'm running Sarge, and my system is using the "main" repository. My
> preference is for Tomcat, but unless I'm much
Hi Scott
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 05:31, Redefined Horizons wrote:
> Java Guys,
>
> I'm having some trouble getting the Debs for Sun's Java in the
> Non-Free section installed. I wanted to check with you guys for a
> solution, and if I'm not messing something up then I will file a bug
> report.
>
>
Hi
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 03:21, Ivan Dubrov wrote:
>
> I've developed simple CDBS extension that uses Eclipse PDE Build for
> building Eclipse plugins. The package is named pdebuild.
>
Given that there is already a command pdebuild, I'd like to suggest a
different name to save possible confusion
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 06:26 pm, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > The reason that I ask is that I would like to try to get Subversions java
> > binding (JavaHL) into the archive. (The current source package has
> >
Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> > Unfortunately jikes 1.22 can't build JavaHL. It does build with Sun's
> > JDK.
>
> Did you report this bug to jikes upstream?
>
I haven't. And I won't since Wolfgang said that jikes is only sticking closer
to the spec than sun's javac.
> > Is kcj coming back?
>
> I thin
Hi
The subject line says it all. Anyone know of any free JDK packages not using
jikes as a compiler?
The reason that I ask is that I would like to try to get Subversions java
binding (JavaHL) into the archive. (The current source package has support
for building JavaHL but it is disabled by d
19 matches
Mail list logo
