Hey guys
while at it can you look at / prepare lucene 3.5 too ?
(I see Mat works on 3.3)
James - {OpenGrok 0.11 will be released with lucene 3.0.2
however the new dev version (0.12 most probably) will use lucene 3.5 (I
just prepared the patch and will push as soon as we get 0.11 out) - mostly
bec
Sorry Michael, my fault, wrong word.
I meant recompiling rather than rebuilding. Opengrok has generics and other
stuff, whether gcj is more like 1.4.2 . So a lot of refactoring would be
involved.
Building against gcj is easy as you say, unless your sources are somewhere
else already ;)
sorry, s
oming!
Lubos
On 6/27/07, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
> Hey, good stuff Seo
>
> Unfortunately opengrok depends on sun-java-jdk , which is in non-free.
> As soon as java will be in main, I'd gladly refresh the package :)
Are you sure it depen
Matt, Eric, Michael
thank you, will do & change the category to contrib/misc
Lubos
On 6/27/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:40:32PM +0200, ?ubo? Ko??o wrote:
> Since I am a packaging newbie, can you please elaborate more on why
should
> it be in contrib ?
it in
contrib before :) ... someone should make up his mind, is democracy
working?)
thanks Matthew !
Lubos
On 6/27/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed Jun 27 12:19, Ľuboš Koščo wrote:
> Hey, good stuff Seo
>
> Unfortunately opengrok depends on sun-java-jdk ,
Hey, good stuff Seo
Unfortunately opengrok depends on sun-java-jdk , which is in non-free. As
soon as java will be in main, I'd gladly refresh the package :)
thnx for the note!
Lubos
On 6/26/07, Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/6/26, Ľuboš Koščo <[EMAIL PROTE
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "opengrok".
* Package name: opengrok
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Chandan B.N, Trond Norbye, Knut Pape, Martin
Englund, Sun Microsystems
* URL : http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/opengrok
* License
7 matches
Mail list logo
