Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote: >As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to. 20230620~deb12u1 is in bookworm-p-u which you could enable to get that kind of fixes for stable earlier; it’ll otherwise be in the next point release. bye, //mirabilos -- Infrastru

Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

How would that work for a pbuilder base image of bookworm? Would I need a hook script to set up the unstable repo and install the package? On Thu, Aug 10, 2023, 9:03 PM Vladimir Petko wrote: > Hi, > > As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to. > Updating to 20230710

Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

Hi, As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to. Updating to 20230710 is also safe as the July security release version contains ca-certificates-java trigger in the postinstall script. Best Regards, Vladimir. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1436785/accepted-ca-cer

Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

Hi guys; sorry for the out-of-band email. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030129 is affecting a number of projects on bookworm, ceph among them; I see that it's been tagged 'bookworm-ignore' and I worry that maybe that means no one is considering a backport to bookworm, but