On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, James Kennard wrote:
>Yes, it has been a long time now, but it's taken time for the alternatives
>to gain traction. I was just trying to understand the current state of play
>to help work out how and when to move away from openjdk-8.
We’ve already moved, as a whole, to openjd
Emmanuel Bourg:
Le 2023-02-13 16:38, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
android-framework-23 is in bullseye. So I doublechecked, it is
actually just a conflict with JDK17, due to the removal of
com.sun.javadoc, which was deprecated in JDK11. JDK8 would cover that
though.
I have no idea how m
Le 2023-02-13 16:38, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
android-framework-23 is in bullseye. So I doublechecked, it is
actually just a conflict with JDK17, due to the removal of
com.sun.javadoc, which was deprecated in JDK11. JDK8 would cover that
though.
I have no idea how much work it'd be to
Hans-Christoph Steiner:
Thorsten Glaser:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Great work there! I would still love to see openjdk-8 in bookworm.
That ship has sailed yesterday. No new entries into testing are now
possible any more.
Damn, that might mean a lot of Android
Yes, it has been a long time now, but it's taken time for the alternatives
to gain traction. I was just trying to understand the current state of play
to help work out how and when to move away from openjdk-8.
Thanks again for all your help.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 14:05, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Thorsten Glaser:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Great work there! I would still love to see openjdk-8 in bookworm.
That ship has sailed yesterday. No new entries into testing are now
possible any more.
Damn, that might mean a lot of Android packages are not going to
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, James Kennard wrote:
>With the changes to Java licensing
What changes? It’s been GPLv2 + Classpath exception for *ages* now.
>, alternative distributions of Java have
>become increasingly popular. They all have their pros and cons,
Perhaps, but we’re still talking about the
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Great work there! I would still love to see openjdk-8 in bookworm.
That ship has sailed yesterday. No new entries into testing are now
possible any more.
> We're
> going to loose a bunch of Android things because doclava cannot run newer
> J
Hi, Hilmar Preuße, and tony:
Thanks for you guide!
I will keep the distribution tag "UNRELEASED" as it is for the sponsor.
The debian/watch was modified to direct to apache archive site ,because:
1.Tag names from github are not well defined[1].
2.Some github release even introduces nonexisted f
Markus Koschany:
Am Mittwoch, dem 01.02.2023 um 12:24 +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
Le 2023-01-26 17:17, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
I've been working on Kotlin lately, trying to make it build with
OpenJDK 17
only, and hopefully have it included in Bookworm.
Long story short, after days bangi
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks again for the explanation.
With the changes to Java licensing, alternative distributions of Java have
become increasingly popular. They all have their pros and cons,
https://whichjdk.com/.
All the best,
James
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 14:06, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Fri,
11 matches
Mail list logo
