Hi Pierre,
>java.io.InvalidClassException: org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.ATN;
>Could not deserialize ATN with version 4 (expected 3)
what exactly does it deserialise there?
Is this maybe something that we should build from source in the
Debian packaging instead?
That would also solve your i
Hi Emmanuel,
Le 26/10/2022 à 18:22, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
Le 26/10/2022 à 16:47, Pierre Gruet a écrit :
My question is: apart from time to work on the package, is there any
reason we should remain with antlr4 4.7.2 in Debian although 4.11.1
has been released upstream?
Yes, an
Hi Pierre,
Le 26/10/2022 à 16:47, Pierre Gruet a écrit :
My question is: apart from time to work on the package, is there any
reason we should remain with antlr4 4.7.2 in Debian although 4.11.1 has
been released upstream?
Yes, antlr is the kind of package you don't want to upgrade, because
Hi Emmanuel,
I am writing to you (but also to the whole team) as you are the uploader
of antlr4.
The latest upstream version of a package I am maintaining in Debian-med
team now fires
java.io.InvalidClassException: org.antlr.v4.runtime.atn.ATN; Could not
deserialize ATN with version 4 (exp
4 matches
Mail list logo
