Re: openjdk-8_8u292-b10-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Wed, 23 Jun 2021, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > openjdk-8 (8u292-b10-3) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Re-upload with actually regenerated debian/control, oops Meh. This SHOULD have failed when building the source package. I fully blame git, unlike proper version control software (that i

openjdk-8_8u292-b10-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 00:05:48 +0200 Source: openjdk-8 Architecture: source Version: 8u292-b10-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Java Maintenance Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser Changes: openjdk-8 (8u292-b

Processing of openjdk-8_8u292-b10-3_source.changes

openjdk-8_8u292-b10-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openjdk-8_8u292-b10-3.dsc openjdk-8_8u292-b10-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Re: [feature request] provide a virtual package for jdk/jre

Hi Samuel, > I'd like to request this same feature for the java ecosystem on Debian. this thing exists: Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless Provides: java2-runtime-headless, java5-runtime-headless, java6-runtime-headless, java7-runtime-headless, java8-runtime-headless # and java-runtime-headless e

[feature request] provide a virtual package for jdk/jre

Hello team, I noticed an upstream project having to resort to "Depends: default-jdk | openjdk-11-jdk | openjdk-8-jdk" to allow its users to install their project with other jdk versions (as they support multiple ones). They also support multiple php versions but they don't need to resort to the s