On 07/05/21 1:40 am, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
[...]
> lintian reports unused paragraph in debian/copyright but that's fairly
> minor. The paragraphs with the same license can be merged to simplify
> the layout.
Some of these will need fixes, while some like the copyright paragraphs
for testData will
On 06/05/21 6:14 pm, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote:
[...]
>>
>> - debian/bootstrap creates a deb, which has the deb itself
>> in the root directory.
>
> This was known but ignored as bootstrap process is only used as input
> for stage1 (stage3/4 output will be uploaded into Debian). This
> lingering d
On 5/7/21 5:36 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2021, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason to use debhelper 13? Does it have anything that
>> is relevant for java packages? Just asking because that's usually
>> something which needs to be downgraded for backports. But I assume
On Fri, 7 May 2021, Phil Morrell wrote:
> Are you planning to upload to stretch
stretch is closed; backports only follow normal release cycles and
desupport LTS. (This is a thing I’m hoping to change when I might
be able to at some point in the future, but nothing’s decided yet.)
bye,
//mirabilo
On Fri, 7 May 2021, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Is there any reason to use debhelper 13? Does it have anything that
> is relevant for java packages? Just asking because that's usually
> something which needs to be downgraded for backports. But I assume
> there are enough dependency requiring debhelpe
Le 2021-05-07 14:55, Phil Morrell a écrit :
I disagree on the version numbering. As described in README.source and
the commit messages for the watch file, this is the standardised format
for MUT support in uscan, admittedly more often seen in javascript.
There is an alternative, checksum '1.3.31
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 10:40:31AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 07/05/2021 à 10:12, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>> sure. but maybe remove the "plus" signs from the upstream version, so that
>> the
>> final 1.31.1 version is newer than the current version? or will it be a
>> 1.31.1+dfsg version?
Le 07/05/2021 à 10:12, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> With that, I can build a deb. However the deb has *no* dependencies.
I've started reviewing the package and I stumbled on this issue as well,
the kotlin .deb should indeed declare its dependencies, otherwise the
symlinks in /usr/share/kotlin/kotl
On 5/7/21 3:14 AM, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote:
> On 06/05/21 9:32 am, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 4/29/21 5:01 PM, Sunil Mohan Adapa wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Kotlin packaging[1] is in a good shape and ready to be uploaded[2] into
>>> Debian. We need a DD willing to upload it.
>>
>>> The actual upload
9 matches
Mail list logo
