On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> If openjdk-17 can't be shipped in bullseyes even with prominent warnings
> that it's unsupported
Users will probably ignore that and use it anyway. It would have been
good if it could be included and kept up to date, but that’s doubling
of efforts, not
Le 02/02/2021 à 19:04, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> bullseye-backports would be the perfect place for providing
> OpenJDK 17 to users on bullseye.
>
> OpenJDK can only be built with the previous version, and doing a
> 11 -> 12 -> 13 -> 14 -> 15 -> 16 -> 17
> bootstrap for 9 release architectures in bu
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:24:29PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 29.10.20 um 15:11 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is a suggested patch for commons-io that would prevent making the
> > test in libsis-base-java fail.
>
> It seems this is a six year old unresolved upstream bug
3 matches
Mail list logo
