Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 11/18/20 8:03 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > New OpenJDK versions tend to cause both buildtime and runtime breakages > > in reverse dependencies, some of them hard to resolve and requiring > > updates to new upstream versions which in turn require new dep

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/18/20 8:03 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> For OpenJDK there are two other possibilities, which would require approval >> by >> release managers / stable release managers. >> >> - openjdk-16 will be released in April 2021, which i

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > [removed the Python 2 bits] > > On 11/17/20 11:08 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Package: debian-security-support > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, t...@security.debian.org > > > openjdk-15 will be included

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/18/20 7:46 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> [removed the Python 2 bits] >> >> On 11/17/20 11:08 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >>> Package: debian-security-support >>> Severity: normal >>> X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, t...@sec

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > [removed the Python 2 bits] > > On 11/17/20 11:08 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Package: debian-security-support > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, t...@security.debian.org > > > openjdk-15 will be included

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Holger Levsen
clone 975016 -1 tags -1 -moreinfo retitle 975016 OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye retitle -1 Python 2 support state for Bullseye # thanks and sorry for the noise, should have done the split immediatly :) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11/18/20 1:36 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Matthias Klose: > >> As background: OpenJDK 12 can only be built with 11, 13 with 12, 14 with 13, >> 15 >> with 14, 16 with 15. Only having 11 in bullseye would make backports more >> "interesting". > > All recent OpenJDK releases can be built by th

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Holger Levsen
control: tags -1 +moreinfo On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > openjdk-15Only included for bootstrapping later OpenJDK > > releases > > > > > > One important thing: These only applies to Bullseye and >

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Matthias Klose: > As background: OpenJDK 12 can only be built with 11, 13 with 12, 14 with 13, > 15 > with 14, 16 with 15. Only having 11 in bullseye would make backports more > "interesting". All recent OpenJDK releases can be built by themselves, right? That's good enough for backports, I t

Re: Bug#975016: Python 2 / OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

2020-11-18 Thread Matthias Klose
[removed the Python 2 bits] On 11/17/20 11:08 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: debian-security-support > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org, t...@security.debian.org > openjdk-15 will be included, but not covered by support > (as it's only needed to bootstrap openjdk-16 and

Re: Request for team membership [was Please accept merge request for building gkl for non-amd64]

2020-11-18 Thread Markus Koschany
Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2020, 09:28 +0100 schrieb Michael R. Crusoe: > Thanks for the merge! > > Consider this my request for membership in the Debian Java Team so I don't > have to bother others in the future :-) I have added you to the Java team on salsa. Cheers, Markus signature.asc Descrip

Request for team membership [was Please accept merge request for building gkl for non-amd64]

2020-11-18 Thread Michael R. Crusoe
Thanks for the merge! Consider this my request for membership in the Debian Java Team so I don't have to bother others in the future :-)