On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:35:11PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > I have no idea what restrictions the lack of cmlxom might imply.
>
> I have packaged and uploaded cmlxom today. Will do so with the rest of
> dependencies.
>
> > Would you take over and upload your changes? If not please push an
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, 22:19 Andreas Tille, wrote:
> I have no idea what restrictions the lack of cmlxom might imply.
>
I have packaged and uploaded cmlxom today. Will do so with the rest of
dependencies.
Would you take over and upload your changes? If not please push and
> let me k
Hi Andrius,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:56:52AM +0200, mer...@debian.org wrote:
> I have managed to get around the most of the build problems. However, a
> lot of the artifacts depend (transitively) on org.xml-cml.cmlxom, which
> is not packaged yet. For the time being I can skip these artifacts, b
Hello Mechthilde,
Am 20.11.19 um 20:10 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
> Hello Markus
>
> Am 19.11.19 um 22:33 schrieb Markus Koschany:
>>
>> Am 19.11.19 um 22:18 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
>> [...]
>>> I already pushed my work without repacking to salsa. I think I should
>>> renew it, but I can't r
Hello Markus
Am 19.11.19 um 22:33 schrieb Markus Koschany:
>
> Am 19.11.19 um 22:18 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann:
> [...]
>> I already pushed my work without repacking to salsa. I think I should
>> renew it, but I can't remove the old wrong one.
>
> You don't need to remove the old files. With git
Hi,
I have managed to get around the most of the build problems. However, a
lot of the artifacts depend (transitively) on org.xml-cml.cmlxom, which
is not packaged yet. For the time being I can skip these artifacts, but
in the long run it would be great to have cmlxom packaged.
Best,
Andrius
6 matches
Mail list logo
