Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates)

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:59 PM Tiago Daitx wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 6:21 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > > Le 28/05/2019 à 11:11, Paul Wise a écrit : > > > > > FTR, uscan is now flexible enough that it can apply arbitrary > > > transformations to the HTML and download URL so it is easy

Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates)

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 6:21 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 28/05/2019 à 11:11, Paul Wise a écrit : > > > FTR, uscan is now flexible enough that it can apply arbitrary > > transformations to the HTML and download URL so it is easy enough to > > create a watch file that works: > > > > version=4 >

Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again

> On May 27, 2019, at 3:19 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: > > On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 11:13, Florian Weimer > wrote: > * Gil Tene: > > > root@020dc36b9046:/# java -version > > openjdk version "1.8.0_212" > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_212-8u212-b01-1~deb9u1

Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again

> On May 27, 2019, at 3:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Gil Tene: > >> root@020dc36b9046:/# java -version >> openjdk version "1.8.0_212" >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_212-8u212-b01-1~deb9u1-b01) >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.212-b01, mixed mode) >> root@020dc36b9046:/#

Re: OpenJDK upstream ↔ Debian packages mapping (was Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again)

Hi Thorsten, I just wanted to respond with a thank you for the explanation! I'm going to sit down with some coffee and map this out and see if/how OpenJDK can provide backport sets. I'll respond here after I have a chat to Matthias next Monday. Cheers, Martijn On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 17:21, Th

Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

Kotlin needs jdk 8 to build. On Tue, 28 May 2019, 3:13 pm John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi! > > On 5/27/19 11:04 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The packages are now accepted and the 8u212-b03 upstream version is now > uploaded > > as well. > > > > The changes

Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

Hi! On 5/27/19 11:04 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > The packages are now accepted and the 8u212-b03 upstream version is now > uploaded > as well. > > The changes and buildinfo files didn't exist anymore for the powerpc, ppc64, > sparc64 and x32 binaries, so if a porter wants to restore those, pleas

Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates)

Le 28/05/2019 à 11:11, Paul Wise a écrit : > FTR, uscan is now flexible enough that it can apply arbitrary > transformations to the HTML and download URL so it is easy enough to > create a watch file that works: > > version=4 > opts="pagemangle=s{ href=\"/jdk-updates/jdk11u/rev/[^\"]*\">\s*(jdk-1

Re: debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates)

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:22 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > There is the Mercurial tags page [1] but unlike GitHub's tags pages it > doesn't play nice with uscan because the links are built with the hash > of the revision and not the value of the tag. FTR, uscan is now flexible enough that it can app

Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again

Hi all, It's one of the challenges, the rest of the world doesn't necessarily know >> about the new `-ga` tag that we use to designate releases, so we need to go >> and help them. >> > > I've also replied separately to this thread (with a meeting request) but > cut out the OpenJDK mailing lists

Re: Mystery meat OpenJDK builds strike again

Hi Florian, > My understanding is that 8u212-b01 is a version identifier created by > > the jdk8u project, and based on a quick check, it matches what Debian > > identifies as its upstream sources (except for some stripping of system > > library components). But it's not the most current re

Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates

Le 27/05/2019 à 18:34, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : >> backports [1], so the (smallish) patch to bring the code up to the >> +7/-ga tag was deemed allowable after all. Thank you for driving this > > More likely it was just not manually reviewed. > > Please don’t do this again but only upload to ba

debian/watch file for OpenJDK (was Re: Debian distributions of stable OpenJDK updates)

Le 27/05/2019 à 18:32, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : >> Is there anything we can do to help going forward? > > An uscan (watch file)-compatible webpage where new formal releases for > all versions are announced, that is consistent, and whose URL doesn’t > change, would be appreciated, as someone alre