> On May 26, 2019, at 3:25 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> I am disappointed to see such trolling, bashing and telling fake news on a
> technical mailing list. Is this Azul's business model to promote their own
> binary builds?
>
> Such behavior propagates e.g. via twitter
> https://twitter.com
Seriously?
You see factual reporting (directly documented and dated in the original
posting) of the actual version numbers being used by official docker images,
along with irrefutable proof that the packages used in those were built weeks
before the respective OpenJDK 8u and 11u releases were c
I am disappointed to see such trolling, bashing and telling fake news on a
technical mailing list. Is this Azul's business model to promote their own
binary builds?
Such behavior propagates e.g. via twitter
https://twitter.com/jroper/status/1130678379403857920
I'm starting the discussion about v
Le 26/05/2019 à 21:52, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>> It looks like upstream is going to append a -ea suffix to the version
>> reported by the pre-releases [1]. This is a welcome clarification and we
>> should ensure our builds do it as well.
>
> no, at least not for the recent release:
> https://ma
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:47:13PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.05.19 20:29, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 15:40, tony mancill wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:58:14PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >>> Le 23/05/2019 à 19:04, Martijn Verburg a écrit :
> >>>
>
Le 26/05/2019 à 21:13, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable
> (although
> the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again
> in
> NEW, targeting unstable.
Thank you for the upload Matthias.
> I honestly do
On 22.05.19 12:24, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/05/2019 à 06:17, tony mancill a écrit :
>
>> For stable backports and buster, I agree that we should upload an
>> 11.0.3-ga package, particularly given the vulnerabilities still present
>> in 11.0.3+1: CVE-2019-2698, CVE-2019-2684, and CVE-2019-2602
On 24.05.19 20:29, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 15:40, tony mancill wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:58:14PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> Le 23/05/2019 à 19:04, Martijn Verburg a écrit :
>>>
What was the difficulty in grabbing the 11.0.3+7 tag directly?
>>>
>>> T
The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable (although
the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again in
NEW, targeting unstable. One of the FTP assistants is objecting to the upload
to unstable, apparently because somebody (security team, Mo
Scilab is an application containing Java, C and C++ code, which
sometimes crashes with what looks like memory corruption. As this bug
can happen during build (building the documentation involves running the
application), it is considered RC [0].
I attempted to locate this bug using Valgrind,
10 matches
Mail list logo
