On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 05:48:30PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Am 17.02.19 um 16:45 schrieb Ingo Bauersachs:
> > Tony, Markus
> >
> >> [...]
> >> Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or
> >> look at other ways to mitigate the FTBFS?
> >
> > I've b
Hi Ingo,
Am 17.02.19 um 16:45 schrieb Ingo Bauersachs:
> Tony, Markus
>
>> [...]
>> Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or
>> look at other ways to mitigate the FTBFS?
>
> I've been notified that weupnp [1] has been marked for autoremoval [2]
> because of this Ja
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 08:22:14PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 15.02.19 um 15:42 schrieb tony mancill:
> [...]
> > Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or
> > look at other ways to mitigate the FTBFS?
>
> Like burning all those -doc packages? :)
>
> In my op
Tony, Markus
> [...]
> Any thoughts on whether we should focus on fixing javadoc generation or
> look at other ways to mitigate the FTBFS?
I've been notified that weupnp [1] has been marked for autoremoval [2]
because of this Javadoc thing, while other packages are not, e.g.
servlet-api [3].
Foll
4 matches
Mail list logo