Re: Minimal versions of the class files in buster

2018-09-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 17/09/2018 à 23:23, Alexandre Rossi a écrit : > What should I do? What is the policy? Java 11 will be the default, but preserving compatibility with Java 8 as much as possible in Buster would be nice. That said, #909040 is a javahelper bug, I added a small class to detect if the JVM is 32 or

Re: Minimal versions of the class files in buster

2018-09-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 17.09.18 um 23:23 schrieb Alexandre Rossi: > Hi, > > I have two ways of fixing #909040 [1] : either I build against an > older jdk or I use a wrapper script ensuring at least java9. > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/909040 > > What should I do? What is the policy? > > Thanks, > > Alex

Minimal versions of the class files in buster

2018-09-17 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi, I have two ways of fixing #909040 [1] : either I build against an older jdk or I use a wrapper script ensuring at least java9. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/909040 What should I do? What is the policy? Thanks, Alex

Re: has anybody looked at adoptopenjdk

2018-09-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 17/09/2018 à 16:09, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > This might be something the debian-java team could look at or perhaps > team with at some later date once they have the house a bit in order ? > > Comments welcome. The build infrastructure used by adoptopenjdk is interesting, especially the autom

has anybody looked at adoptopenjdk

2018-09-17 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, I was reading https://blog.joda.org/2018/08/java-is-still-available-at-zero-cost.html I know that the Debian openjdk team is small . Has anybody have been able to look at - https://adoptopenjdk.net/support.html and https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-build This might be somethi