Dear all,
Can somebody who knows the Debian-java integration and otherwise
please take a look at the discussion at
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-policy/merge_requests/5 and
comment both on the code and the reaction happening therein.
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिर
Le 03/09/2018 à 17:41, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> GCJ is more portable and can create native executables for
> many Java™ programs (though not those doing classloader
> magic at runtime, for example) — these two reasons are still
> extant, although I have heard GCJ no longer is :|
GCJ is indeed
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > I was surprised to know that gnu java which at one point was a
> > high-priority project was deprecated within gcc
>
> When Sun released Java under the GPL and started the OpenJDK project it
> lost its raison d'être.
One of them.
GCJ is more portabl
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> The java-policy package should have a copy of the original document (with no
> alterations). It should also include a README file to point contributors to
> the
> Salsa repository for the java-faw
I am a bit confuse
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 10:46:09AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> at bottom :-
...
> and then realized had forgotten to remove the earlier revision
> date/time-stamp which I did.
That's true for policy. I think we should keep such information so I
added it back in the safe way.
> Please go
5 matches
Mail list logo
