Re: shouldn't openjdk-11-jre have maintainer as debian-java@lists.debian.org instead of open...@lists.launchpad.net and openjfx

2018-08-23 Thread shirish शिरीष
Reply in-line :- On 24/08/2018, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Shirish, > Hi Emmanuel, > On 23/08/2018 16:09, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> Wouldn't it better to have the maintainer be reflected to >> debian-java@lists.debian.org perhaps ? IIRC there used to be an alioth >> list which used to look at the

Re: shouldn't openjdk-11-jre have maintainer as debian-java@lists.debian.org instead of open...@lists.launchpad.net and openjfx

2018-08-23 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Shirish, On 23/08/2018 16:09, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Wouldn't it better to have the maintainer be reflected to > debian-java@lists.debian.org perhaps ? IIRC there used to be an alioth > list which used to look at the maintenance before. debian-java@lists.debian.org is a discussion list. Using

Re: Do you have any clue? [andr...@an3as.eu: cgview.jar does not find class from batik-util]

2018-08-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 07:58:55PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > > sorry for pinging in private but the issue is urgent for my colleagues ... > > I still do not find where the issue comes from. I see no direct reference to > xmlconstants in source code. > Could problem be in a dependency a'd

shouldn't openjdk-11-jre have maintainer as debian-java@lists.debian.org instead of open...@lists.launchpad.net and openjfx

2018-08-23 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, Please CC me as I'm not a subscribed member of the list. I was looking at openjdk-11-jre and aptitude shows - $ aptitude show openjdk-11-jre Package: openjdk-11-jre Version: 11~24-1 State: not installed Multi-Arch: same Priority: optional Section: java Maintainer: OpenJDK Team Archite