Package: pdftk
Version: 2.02-4+b2
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
There is a new, java-only version/conversion of pdftk at
https://gitlab.com/marcvinyals/pdftk
This would deal with a lot of problems and FTBFS bugs regarding the removal
of gcj...
Please, package this new version as it would be very hard
Am 04.04.2018 um 10:24 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>
>> I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and openjfx is
>> split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support for
>> some time.
>
> +1, Oracle has announced
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 11:15:59AM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2018-04-04 10:24, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> >
> > > I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and
> > > openjfx is
> > > split out there. So yes, maybe packages
On 2018-04-04 10:24, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit :
I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and
openjfx is
split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support
for some time.
+1, Oracle has announced last month [1] t
Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and openjfx is
> split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support for some
> time.
+1, Oracle has announced last month [1] that JavaFX would be decoupled
from Java 1
On 04.04.2018 07:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/23/2017 01:00 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 22/10/2017 à 12:57, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>>> (C) looks like the best workaround for now. Looking at at least four
>>> security
>>> releases per year, and maybe the double amount of package
6 matches
Mail list logo
