Le 29/11/2017 à 19:08, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> It doesn't build for me with pure gradle either. The latest version
> works when I skip the tests but I don't know how comparable that is
> because the upstream version comes with tons of prebuilt jar files and
> happily downloads even more from t
Am 28.11.2017 um 00:07 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> On 11/26/2017 09:23 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I have uploaded Gradle 3.4.1 to experimental. I have rebuilt
>> almost all reverse-dependencies of gradle/gradle-debian-helper by now
>> and so far it looks quite good with two notable re
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove the not-yet-commons-ssl package. It's unused and
it fails to build with Java 9 (#874157).
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove the liboptimization-java package. It's unused and
it fails to build with Java 9 (#874647).
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
On 29.11.2017 12:46, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit :
I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by
themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically,
since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its Java packagin
Le 29/11/2017 à 13:30, dalibor topic a écrit :
> I think what makes Debian GNU/Linux interesting for us regarding the
> OpenJDK Quality Outreach is that it's one of the first Linux
> distributions to do mass rebuilds of its (quite substantial) package
> archive with JDK 9. So it has the means and
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:46:20PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit :
> > If not, then I'd suggest stopping further early access announcements
> > mails to this mailing list, Rory, and sending them to Emmanuel directly
> > instead, while anyone else intere
On 29.11.2017 10:20, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
From my experience on other lists also receiving these
notifications I know this is a good opportunity to gather and take into
account the community feedback.
That's the general idea, yeah!
A list of FOSS projects participating in the OpenJDK quality
Le 29/11/2017 à 10:32, dalibor topic a écrit :
> I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by
> themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically,
> since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its Java packaging.
Actually these binaries can be turned
I think that as soon as someone objects to having mail sent to a public
list, the sending should end.
I'd agree with Matthias that the binaries of some builds are not by
themselves newsworthy for the debian-java mailing list specifically,
since Debian doesn't use third party binaries in its Ja
Hi Rory,
Le 29/11/2017 à 10:01, Rory O'Donnell a écrit :
> If you want me to stop sending emails to this list let me know ?
I'm personally glad that you send these emails to the debian-java list.
They are sent barely once or twice a month and contain useful
information. From my experience on oth
Hi Emmanuel,
If you want me to stop sending emails to this list let me know ?
Rgds,Rory
On 29/11/2017 08:12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 29/11/2017 à 02:16, Matthias Klose a écrit :
is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only,
architecture limited builds on a ma
Le 29/11/2017 à 02:16, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> is it really necessary to have these advertisements of Oracle's binary only,
> architecture limited builds on a mailing list of a community project dedicated
> to build binaries from sources? I can't find such advertisements on e.g.
> mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
