Re: guacamole: deal with libjaxb-java (2.3.0-1) changes

2017-10-24 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 23:50:59 +0200 Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > I checked the package and the right replacement for jaxb-impl is > actually jaxb-runtime and not jaxb1-impl. I added a symlink in > libjaxb-java/2.3.0-2, let me know how it works for you. 　Thanks, it seems to work fine. -- Regards,

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-24 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 24/10/2017 à 09:09, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan a écrit : > Why not keep the source package name as "openjfx" and then name the binary > package "openjdk-9-jfx"? src:openjfx can't be reused for OpenJFX 9, because I need it to backport OpenJFX 8 updates for Stretch. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-24 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
Why not keep the source package name as "openjfx" and then name the binary package "openjdk-9-jfx"? Emmanuel Bourg 於 2017年10月23日 07:00 寫道: > Le 22/10/2017 à 12:57, Matthias Klose a écrit : > >> Are you aware if upstream is aware of these issues, and if they intend to >> stop >> using internal Op