Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-22 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 22/10/2017 à 12:57, Matthias Klose a écrit : > Are you aware if upstream is aware of these issues, and if they intend to stop > using internal OpenJDK APIs? Any plans to get rid off the single file approach > for the database files? I don't know. At least they are aware that OpenJFX fails to b

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-22 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 22.10.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Mykola Nikishov: > Markus Koschany writes: > >> Indeed D is not really an option and would be the end for Netbeans, >> pdfsam, mediathekview and a future Eclipse version. I wonder how other >> distributions like Fedora will deal with this issue in the future. > > M

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-22 Thread Mykola Nikishov
Markus Koschany writes: > Indeed D is not really an option and would be the end for Netbeans, > pdfsam, mediathekview and a future Eclipse version. I wonder how other > distributions like Fedora will deal with this issue in the future. Markus, could you elaborate on 'a future Eclipse version'? I

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-22 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 22.10.2017 um 17:27 schrieb 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan: > (D) doesn't seem good to me, since lot of apps are using JavaFX (e.g. > NetBeans and Bisq). These apps won't even launch using Debian's default JRE > if OpenJFX isn't included, which would be quite annoying to some users. Indeed D is not real

Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts?

2017-10-22 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 10.09.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Christopher Hoskin: > Dear Markus, > > Thanks - that's useful to know. > > ratt -dry_run batik_1.9-1_source.changes 2> >(wc -l) > 554 > > Hmm, this could take a while... I guess it must be looking for > recursive reverse build dependencies? > > Christopher Yes, p

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-22 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
(D) doesn't seem good to me, since lot of apps are using JavaFX (e.g. NetBeans and Bisq). These apps won't even launch using Debian's default JRE if OpenJFX isn't included, which would be quite annoying to some users. Matthias Klose 於 2017年10月22日 18:57 寫道: > On 12.10.2017 13:13, Emmanuel Bourg w

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-22 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12.10.2017 13:13, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > I started working on OpenJFX 9 this week. The good news is that it > builds fine in Debian now [1]. The bad news is that it's going to be > significantly more challenging to integrate it with our OpenJDK package. > > With OpenJDK 8 the inte