Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 17/10/2017 à 17:18, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan a écrit : > Although I like Plan C, it has more issues like: > >   * Circular build-dependency between openjdk and openjfx (or there is > already one?) True but I don't think this is really a problem. The OpenJFX integration could be disabled in openjd

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-17 Thread 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
Hello Emmanuel, Thank you for your hard work on OpenJFX! Although I like Plan C, it has more issues like:   * Circular build-dependency between openjdk and openjfx (or there is already one?)   * Strange versioning pattern of openjdk rebuilds. (9~b181-5+ vs 9~b181-5+b1) Looks like the extensib

Re: CDBS regression affecting Java packages

2017-10-17 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 17.10.2017 um 12:40 schrieb Matthias Klose: > On 14.10.2017 11:29, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> FYI many Java packages are currently failing to build due to a >> regression in CDBS 0.4.143 (#878510). The DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION variable >> now contains the Debian revision and the builds t

Re: CDBS regression affecting Java packages

2017-10-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 17/10/2017 à 12:40, Matthias Klose a écrit : > I see that many packages are now converted to use plain debhelper. Should > that > be a soft release goal for all java packages? Yes I think it's a good idea to standardize on a single system to simplify the maintenance (23% Java packages use CD

Re: CDBS regression affecting Java packages

2017-10-17 Thread Matthias Klose
On 14.10.2017 11:29, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > FYI many Java packages are currently failing to build due to a > regression in CDBS 0.4.143 (#878510). The DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION variable > now contains the Debian revision and the builds typically break during > the install phase because the