Re: guacamole: deal with libjaxb-java (2.3.0-1) changes

2017-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 12/10/2017 à 13:21, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > Maybe this issue should be addressed in libjaxb-java instead, by adding > a symlink from /usr/share/java/jaxb-impl.jar to jaxb1-impl.jar. I > haven't checked if the content of the jars matches. I checked the package and the right replacement for j

RE: ca-certificates-java changes

2017-10-12 Thread Ingo Bauersachs
> Le 30/09/2017 à 17:09, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > >> IMHO consistency within Debian is *much* more important. >> >> I would be seriously fucked off if I could connect to a host >> using something like wget but not a Java™ application, after >> installing the custom CA into /etc/ssl/certs or si

Re: [jackson-dataformat-xml] 01/13: Remove --has-package-version flag.

2017-10-12 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 12.10.2017 um 01:12 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: [...] > Could we keep the --has-package-version flags please? If we change the > behavior of maven-debian-helper in a near future putting them back in > all packages is going to take a lot of time. There is really no harm > keeping them for now. First

Re: ca-certificates-java changes

2017-10-12 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Emmanuel, > Similarly I would be seriously fucked off if the application I developed > on another OS would behave differently once deployed on my Debian server > with the same version of Java ;) > > Both use cases are valid I think, maybe we could have it both ways with with an upstream hat o

Re: guacamole: deal with libjaxb-java (2.3.0-1) changes

2017-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 10/10/2017 à 13:35, Hideki Yamane a écrit : > Can someone review below change, please? Hi Hideki, This looks good but unfortunately the package dependencies won't help ensuring that the right version of libjaxb-java is installed to satisfy the symlink. Maybe this issue should be addressed i

OpenJFX 9 integration

2017-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I started working on OpenJFX 9 this week. The good news is that it builds fine in Debian now [1]. The bad news is that it's going to be significantly more challenging to integrate it with our OpenJDK package. With OpenJDK 8 the integration was just a matter of installing extra jar files a

Re: ca-certificates-java_20170930_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 2/10/2017 à 23:16, Tiago Daitx a écrit : > To give an overview of the issue, this happens during install time > when both openjdk and ca-certificates are being installed because > /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/jvm.cfg is a symlink > to /etc/java-8-openjdk/jvm-amd64.cfg (on amd

Re: ca-certificates-java changes

2017-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 12/10/2017 à 11:58, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > 2. ca-certificates-java still generates a keystore from the Debian > certificates but with a different name (cacerts-debian for example). > 3. Patch openjdk to use cacerts-debian in priority if it exists, and > default to cacerts otherwise. Anothe

Re: ca-certificates-java changes

2017-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 30/09/2017 à 17:09, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > IMHO consistency within Debian is *much* more important. > > I would be seriously fucked off if I could connect to a host > using something like wget but not a Java™ application, after > installing the custom CA into /etc/ssl/certs or similar, or

Re: Fwd: A lot of packages fixed to build with jdk9

2017-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Fridrich, Thanks a lot for sharing your work. FYI in Debian we opted for bumping the source/target level directly at the Ant [1] and Maven [2] level instead of patching the packages individually. So far we still have ~140 packages to fix [3] before switching the default JRE to OpenJDK 9. Emman

Fwd: A lot of packages fixed to build with jdk9

2017-10-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Fyi, Forwarded Message Subject: A lot of packages fixed to build with jdk9 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:42:29 +0200 From: Fridrich Strba To: IcedTea Hello, good people, In openSUSE Tumbleweed, our rolling distribution, we switched to OpenJDK9 as a default Java since a week befor

Re: scalatest + graddle

2017-10-12 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Olivier, Le 12/10/2017 à 10:05, Olivier Sallou a écrit : > Anyone working on packaging it (did not find it in Debian) ? Or having > an easy way to patch the build file to use *regular* graddle testing (I > never used graddle) instead of scaltest. I'm not aware of anyone working on it. scalate

scalatest + graddle

2017-10-12 Thread Olivier Sallou
Hi, one of our packages (htsjdk) introduced scalatest dependency with graddle build file to make their tests. Anyone working on packaging it (did not find it in Debian) ? Or having an easy way to patch the build file to use *regular* graddle testing (I never used graddle) instead of scaltest. up