On 10 August 2017 at 21:14, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> On 08/10/2017 08:52 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
>
>> So how to address this? I guess that I should add such pom.xml file
>> to the existing imagej package. I could do that with the debian-med
>> team but could someone give me any pointers? Or shoul
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:13:18PM -0400, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10.08.2017 09:09, tony mancill wrote:
> >
> > This has the result of building a separate .deb for every architecture
> > [0], which will function as expected up until the time that a user needs
> > multi-arch, at which point the
On 10.08.2017 09:09, tony mancill wrote:
> Java bindings to the GDCM DICOM library. It allows developers to use
> GDCM from Java environment.
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2017-08-07 07:28 ./
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2017-08-07 07:28 ./usr/
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2017-08-07
On 08/10/2017 08:52 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
> So how to address this? I guess that I should add such pom.xml file
> to the existing imagej package. I could do that with the debian-med
> team but could someone give me any pointers? Or should something else
> be done instead? There is a bunch of
On 08/10/2017 11:18 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> I am not sure what you mean here, though that might be because of my
> personal ignorance of how JNI works. Could you be a bit more explicit
> please?
Libraries using native code adopt various strategies to load the
external library. Sometimes th
On 08/10/2017 03:09 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> That is, this approach "works" in the non-multi-arch case, but should be
> avoided.
It also wastes space on the Debian mirrors, since the 300ko of gdcm.jar
is duplicated in each arch specific package (19 times, so it uses 6MB
instead of 330KB).
Emman
Hi
I am packaging a java library and ImageJ plugin that uses maven. It
is dependent on ij.jar from net.imagej. In Debian, ij.jar is provided
by the imagej package [1] but there is no pom.xml there even though
there is one on maven central.
What happens is that imagej1 [2] makes use of ant and n
On 08/08/17 20:50, Tom Marble wrote:
All:
Here are my rough notes from today's BOF.. Please followup with
corrections!
Thanks Tom for taking all these notes yesterday.
5. javadoc
- Our packages that are standards 4.0.1 compliant should support
"nodoc"
- Some users appreciate of
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:18:24AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 08/08/17 21:56, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> > You'll have to ensure the .so file isn't included in the jar, this may
> > require some tweaking of the library loading code.
>
> I am not sure what you mean here, though that might
On 08/08/17 21:56, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
On 08/05/2017 10:16 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
I was wondering which files should be installed (and to which location)
to produce corresponding Java packages which are policy compliant.
Hi Ghislain,
As I understand you'll need two binary packages fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
