Re: Security update of mysql-connector-java

2016-06-21 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:01:14AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 22.06.2016 00:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 22/06/2016 à 00:28, Markus Koschany a écrit : > > > >> Houston, we have a problem. It seems the latest upstream release > >> requires Java 8 for building JDBC 4. In Jessie even Java

Re: Security update of mysql-connector-java

2016-06-21 Thread Markus Koschany
On 22.06.2016 00:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 22/06/2016 à 00:28, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> Houston, we have a problem. It seems the latest upstream release >> requires Java 8 for building JDBC 4. In Jessie even Java 6 was >> sufficient. I suggest we ship version 5.1.34 of mysql-connector-j

Re: Security update of mysql-connector-java

2016-06-21 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 22/06/2016 à 00:28, Markus Koschany a écrit : > Houston, we have a problem. It seems the latest upstream release > requires Java 8 for building JDBC 4. In Jessie even Java 6 was > sufficient. I suggest we ship version 5.1.34 of mysql-connector-java > instead, which should build fine with Java 6

Re: Security update of mysql-connector-java

2016-06-21 Thread Markus Koschany
On 20.06.2016 19:41, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 20.06.2016 19:38, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am thinking about to upgrade mysql-connector-java to the latest stable >>> version in Wheezy and Jessie to address >>

Re: Please review libjt400-java

2016-06-21 Thread Markus Koschany
On 21.06.2016 23:19, Luca Vercelli wrote: > Dear Markus, > are you sure of this? The package is built with Ant, not with Maven, so > it cannot be a pure Maven package, am I wrong? Hello, That's probably a misunderstanding. I meant it is a pure "maven-repo-helper" package (referring to the Debian

Re: Please review libjt400-java

2016-06-21 Thread Luca Vercelli
Dear Markus, are you sure of this? The package is built with Ant, not with Maven, so it cannot be a pure Maven package, am I wrong? Il 21/06/2016 01:07, Markus Koschany ha scritto: > Hello Julián, > > On 21.06.2016 00:43, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote: > [...] >> I believe that some maven jars are m