Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:44:07AM -0800, Andrew Schurman wrote:
>
> Based on the history of the repo, it appears to be the same project by
> the same author. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to use this
> new repo. If you want to be extra cautious, you could compare source of
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 16:26 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> As far as I understand its renamed by the same author.
You're right. I didn't realize this.
> I perfectly agree - but I have no idea how to find the according
> source
> code. I feel a bit unsafe to checkout the new repository and
> chec
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 06:20:27PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > Sun did that for us 11 years ago in Java 5 ;) Try this replacement:
> >
> > s = String.format(fmtstr, o);
>
> What do I need to import to access this?
Forget this question - I've found
--- a/util/Makefile
+++ b/util/Mak
Hi Andreas,
El Vie, 29 de Ene de 16, a las 11:20 AM, Andreas Tille escribió:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:58:48PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 29/01/2016 16:44, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> >
> > > I wonder whether some Java programmer could provide some simple
> > > replacement.
> >
> > Sun
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:58:48PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 29/01/2016 16:44, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > I wonder whether some Java programmer could provide some simple
> > replacement.
>
> Sun did that for us 11 years ago in Java 5 ;) Try this replacement:
>
> s = String.format(
Hi all,
Since there is no consensus to maintain a subset of Jenkins I'll proceed
with its removal (#811522). I'll also request the removal of the Jenkins
specific libraries. Here is the list of packages I've identified, let me
know if there are others:
access-modifier-checker
bytecode-compati
Le 29/01/2016 16:44, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> I wonder whether some Java programmer could provide some simple
> replacement.
Sun did that for us 11 years ago in Java 5 ;) Try this replacement:
s = String.format(fmtstr, o);
Emmanuel Bourg
Hi again,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:44:14PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > I got a quick look and you might be right, the goto_trans stuff seems
> > optional. What happens if you don't install javab in the f2j package?
>
> I did a quick test with a local build. I can easily build
> libnet
Hi Emmanuel,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:54:16AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > So my question is: Do we possibly rely here on a non-free tool that
> > is really not needed and we could simply drop it?
>
> I got a quick look and you might be right, the goto_trans stuff seems
> optional. What ha
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove the maven2 package, it has been replaced with maven and is no
longer used.
Thank you,
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 29/01/2016 11:19, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> So my question is: Do we possibly rely here on a non-free tool that
> is really not needed and we could simply drop it?
I got a quick look and you might be right, the goto_trans stuff seems
optional. What happens if you don't install javab in the f2
Hi,
since I'm really bored by the non-free f2c package which throws a
certain number of packages into contrib I checked again what we could
do. It seems the main reason why f2c is non-free is that it includes
goto_trans (non-commercial use, no fee). The code describes itself
as
JAVAB -- A proto
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:44:32PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/01/2016 22:32, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > Did I miss some declaration of the version? I decided to keep 1.1
> > since that fits the download version better than 1.2-SNAPSHOT.
>
> I pushed some tweaks, but at
13 matches
Mail list logo
