Bug#812548: ITP: qdox2 -- quickly parses declarations and Javadoc from Java source

2016-01-24 Thread Markus Koschany
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Markus Koschany * Package name: qdox2 Version : 2.0~M3 Upstream Author : Joe Walnes and QDox Project Team * URL : https://github.com/codehaus/qdox * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : quickl

Re: About Jenkins in Debian

2016-01-24 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 24/01/2016 16:54, 殷啟聰 a écrit : > So if my understanding is right, Jenkins is highly likely to be > removed from Debian. And the reason behind this is because the release > cycle of Jenkins is way too short and upstream already provides .deb? Yes that's correct. The security fixes for Jenkins

Re: About Jenkins in Debian

2016-01-24 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 24.01.2016 um 16:54 schrieb 殷啟聰: > Hi, > > So if my understanding is right, Jenkins is highly likely to be > removed from Debian. And the reason behind this is because the release > cycle of Jenkins is way too short and upstream already provides .deb? Upstream has a so called LTS Release

Re: About Jenkins in Debian

2016-01-24 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
Hi Kai-Chung Yan, I don't have an answer to your question but I would like to point out that gradle [1] does not depend on SBT [2]. They do similar things but SBT is Scala oriented while Gradle aims to be a more generic build tool. Regarding your question, from my experience during Debconf Heidle

Re: About Jenkins in Debian

2016-01-24 Thread 殷啟聰
Hi, So if my understanding is right, Jenkins is highly likely to be removed from Debian. And the reason behind this is because the release cycle of Jenkins is way too short and upstream already provides .deb? So this makes me think about what exactly should be packaged into Debian. There are not