Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Mikołaj Izdebski
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I > have to agree with this page: > > https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ > > In the "License Grant", it seems that it could be problem

Re: Docker image to help debian-java

2015-12-08 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 2015-12-08 13:48, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 8/12/2015 13:31, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : Don't hesitate to comment and improve ;-) Excellent idea, thank you! Here are a few suggestions picked from my build environment: I'll add extra dependencies. I'm not a docker expert but I plan to use

Re: Docker image to help debian-java

2015-12-08 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 8/12/2015 13:31, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : > Don't hesitate to comment and improve ;-) Excellent idea, thank you! Here are a few suggestions picked from my build environment: - install and configure pbuilder sudo pbuilder create --debootstrapopts --variant=buildd create /root/.pbuilde

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 2015-12-08 13:25, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 8/12/2015 13:01, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : Any thoughts? As I understand this "license grant" covers the specification. The implementation is licensed under the Apache-2.0 license (which includes a handy patent protection clause). You are right,

Docker image to help debian-java

2015-12-08 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi, I created a debian-java image to build java packages. It's based on this email: https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2013/04/msg00134.html (I use 'sid', not 'testing') Don't hesitate to comment and improve ;-) https://hub.docker.com/r/avdyk/debian-java/ Regards, -- Arnaud Vandyck http

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 8/12/2015 13:01, Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : > Any thoughts? As I understand this "license grant" covers the specification. The implementation is licensed under the Apache-2.0 license (which includes a handy patent protection clause). Emmanuel Bourg

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 08/12/15 12:01, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Hi, I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I have to agree with this page: https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ In the "License Grant", it seems that it could be problematic to packag

Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi, I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I have to agree with this page: https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ In the "License Grant", it seems that it could be problematic to package osgi in Debian. Am I right? Any though