Le 30/09/2015 20:19, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> I think we should file bug reports and start replacing
> libcommons-httpclient-java with libhttpclient-java.
I'm not convinced by the need to force this transition. Patching the
rare security issues requires much less resources than rewriting and
t
Hi,
I think we should file bug reports and start replacing
libcommons-httpclient-java with libhttpclient-java.
Reasoning:
commons-httpclient is obsolete and has been EOL since 2011. It is no
longer supported and was/is affected by multiple security issues. [1]
I suggest to file bug reports with
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:26:39AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> BTW, can another builds be retried?
yes, every team member has a mean to schedule packages for building.
> I was interested on retriggering jruby build since is tagged as FTBFS
> since some days ago and I know for sure is not FTBF
Am 30.09.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
[...]
> This wouldn't work with the current implementation, which is emailing
> $p...@packages.debian.org. Anyway, I received a suggestion of setting up
> a new PTS keyword, so then people can go and subscribe there, maybe
> using the team facility of
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:13:40AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:27:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> > Markus (and the others), do you think it's ok to keep the notifications
> > if they are limited to unstable ? Or would you prefer disabling them
> > completely
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:27:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Markus (and the others), do you think it's ok to keep the notifications
> if they are limited to unstable ? Or would you prefer disabling them
> completely until the build environment stabilizes?
I think there is value in receivi
Le 30/09/2015 13:00, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> We have never discussed this before as a team. I vote for unsubscribing
> pkg-java because of the issues that were pointed out already.
I did request the notifications for the team, but I didn't really expect
so many false positives. Sorry for the
Hi,
Am 30.09.2015 um 12:30 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> Hi,
>
> (mostly ignoring the rest as this has been addressed already.)
>
> On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I understand that everything is still in development. However I don't
>> think a public mailing list is a suit
Hi,
(mostly ignoring the rest as this has been addressed already.)
On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I understand that everything is still in development. However I don't
> think a public mailing list is a suitable testbed. My preferred solution
> would be to make receivin
9 matches
Mail list logo
