On 29 septembrie 2015 19:49:54 EEST, Markus Koschany wrote:
>Am 29.09.2015 um 14:07 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I intend to package Beast2 for the Debian Med team[1]. I was able to
>> replace nearly all JARs that came with upstream tarball but there are
>> two remaining ones:
>>
>> 1.
Am 29.09.2015 um 14:07 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to package Beast2 for the Debian Med team[1]. I was able to
> replace nearly all JARs that came with upstream tarball but there are
> two remaining ones:
>
> 1. antlr-runtime-4.5.jar
> It seems that we have antlr-runtime ver
Am 29.09.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 29/09/2015 16:32, Markus Koschany a écrit :
[...]
> I agree the false positive are annoying, but this is understandable
> since the system is still in development (the recent addition of
> disorderfs caused some troubles for example). Fortunately
Le 29/09/2015 17:08, Holger Levsen a écrit :
> I agree and am wondering if we should actually do this, and limit
> (maintainer)
> notifications to unstable? What do you think?
Well, if I understood your "this graph is a lie" properly in your talks,
I think the reproducibility in testing isn't v
Hi,
On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I would like to take the opportunity to raise the following concern. I
> support the reproducible builds effort but I think the periodic e-mails
> to pkg-java are often not useful enough at the moment. There are far too
> many false-pos
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:00:30AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:05:15PM +, Reproducible builds folks wrote:
> > More information on
> > https://reproducible.debian.net/testing/amd64/libibatis-java, feel free to
> > reply to this email to get more help.
>
> Hi fo
Hi,
thanks for explaining, Emmanuel!
On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Actually I tend to prefer the reports in unstable. The reports in
> testing are often duplicates of issues already known in unstable, and
> sometimes they are already fixed in unstable when they are noti
Le 29/09/2015 16:32, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> I would like to take the opportunity to raise the following concern. I
> support the reproducible builds effort but I think the periodic e-mails
> to pkg-java are often not useful enough at the moment. There are far too
> many false-positives. The l
Am 29.09.2015 um 16:00 schrieb Miguel Landaeta:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:05:15PM +, Reproducible builds folks wrote:
>> More information on
>> https://reproducible.debian.net/testing/amd64/libibatis-java, feel free to
>> reply to this email to get more help.
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Thank you
Hi,
I intend to package Beast2 for the Debian Med team[1]. I was able to
replace nearly all JARs that came with upstream tarball but there are
two remaining ones:
1. antlr-runtime-4.5.jar
It seems that we have antlr-runtime version 3 of this in the
package libantlr3-runtime-java but
10 matches
Mail list logo
