On 09/02/2015 11:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 03/09/2015 06:09, tony mancill a écrit :
>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I would wait for the final BCEL release, things may change again, and
> there is no urge to update BCEL since our version is already compatible
> with Java 8.
Thank you for the input.
This worksforme.
Andreas.
Index: jdk8u-3e6d3c8810ee/common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh
===
--- jdk8u-3e6d3c8810ee.orig/common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh
+++ jdk8u-3e6d3c8810ee/common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh
@@ -6862,
On 09/03/2015 04:44 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> This worksforme.
Am I missing an email? I can't see Andreas' reply anywhere.
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - gl
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> This worksforme.
Cool, thanks! I see some parts I already had, and I suspect that
a couple of the extra struct aligns were what I had missing.
@Doko: I’ll have another look at this then.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-5
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - openjdk-7 m68k is "not-for-us", needing intervention from somebody
It doesn’t work (not even Zero does), and nobody is capable enough
and has enough time to fix it (I tried, when I had a bit more time
for m68k, but I didn’t manage to fix either this
On 09/03/2015 08:53 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 03/09/2015 00:39, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>
>> I disagree. Please revert mips/mipsel back to gcj, or fix the mips/mipsel
>> builds
>> for openjdk-8 (and for openjdk-9). The other alternative would be not to
>> build
>> the packages for mips/mi
6 matches
Mail list logo
