Bug#770579: marked as done (java-common: Please remove me from uploaders)

2015-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:22:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#770579: fixed in java-common 0.53 has caused the Debian Bug report #770579, regarding java-common: Please remove me from uploaders to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#730133: marked as done (java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre)

2015-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:22:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#730133: fixed in java-common 0.53 has caused the Debian Bug report #730133, regarding java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Re: OpenJDK 8 transition

2015-09-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Thanks a lot for the rebuild and the analysis Chris. There is some noise caused by the maven2 dependency changes (i.e. the maven-scm and junit4 failures popping around these days), I'll try to clear that quickly to have a better picture of the issues left. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: OpenJDK 8 transition

2015-09-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 29/07/2015 16:36, tmanc...@debian.org a écrit : > Any concerns with an upload of java-commons to experimental sooner than > September? I uploaded java-commons/0.53 to experimental with the switch to openjdk-8. I plan to switch sid in two weeks. Emmanuel Bourg

Re: OpenJDK 8 transition

2015-09-01 Thread Chris West
I did a practice partial archive rebuild with ebourg's 1.8 default-jdk, to see what kind of problems might be left. 1144 packages[1] that dose-debuildcheck thinks depend on default-jdk, around ten unexpected/new failures. My full notes are on whiteboard[2], with a backup at time of sending[3]. F