Am 28.08.2015 um 22:16 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
[...]
>
> For the code to be compliant with DFSG does each one need a valid
> header, or is a statement from upstream sufficient? I also noticed a
> lot of image files used in Azureus and was not sure of their licence
> so I have asked about those too
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 18.08.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> [...]
>
> I have made some minor changes and pushed them to the git repository. I
> hope that's OK. We should probably scale Azureus.png to 128x128 pixel
> (currently it is 128x131) to avoid
Dear java packagers,
I am looking for a sponsor for package "swt4-gtk".
* Package name: swt4-gtk
Version : 4.5.0-1
Upstream Author : The Eclipse Foundation
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/swt/
* License : EPL-1.0
Section : libs
It builds those
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > (1) Will openjdk-8 break anything on wheezy?
[ … details … ]
> Other incompatibilities are documented upstream [2] and may affect your
> applications [2].
Thanks, that is good information.
> > (2) Who’s going to upload to wheezy-backports-sloppy?
>
Hi Thorsten,
Le 28/08/2015 14:33, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> (1) Will openjdk-8 break anything on wheezy?
You can get a look at the transition bugs [1] and see what can be
expected by using openjdk-8 with wheezy. As a quick summary, opendjk-8
broke:
- libraries doing bytecode manipulation (asm,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Hi all,
I’d like to ask something that is probably relevant for $dayjob.
tl;dr:
(1) Will openjdk-8 break anything on wheezy?
(2) Who’s going to upload to wheezy-backports-sloppy?
(3) Will backport uploads be made in timely fashion?
(4) How and whe
6 matches
Mail list logo
