Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.31
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Please consider adding the attached check for JAR names that are
compliant with the Debian Java Policy. This warning is useful because
some components of the Debian Java toolchain fail when JAR files don't
comply with the namin
Am 05.07.2015 um 20:18 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 05/07/2015 09:11, Jan Henke a écrit :
>
>> I would like to open discussion, whether it is possible to make the jdk
>> depend on the headless jre only. The full jre could be a recommends, so
>> it does get install by default, but advanced users can
On 07/05/2015 11:18 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 05/07/2015 09:11, Jan Henke a écrit :
>
>> I would like to open discussion, whether it is possible to make the jdk
>> depend on the headless jre only. The full jre could be a recommends, so
>> it does get install by default, but advanced users can
Le 05/07/2015 09:11, Jan Henke a écrit :
> I would like to open discussion, whether it is possible to make the jdk
> depend on the headless jre only. The full jre could be a recommends, so
> it does get install by default, but advanced users can choose to not
> install it.
Hi Jan,
I tend to agre
Hi Emmanuel,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 08:08:32AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > I verified that libjsr305-java is in Build-Depends but I have no idea how
> > to cope with this.
>
> The artifact in the libjsr305-java package has the version 0.x, you need
> a Maven rule (in debian/maven.rules) lik
Hi!
I assume this topic has been discussed in the past, but I do not know
where to find any past discussion.
I am wondering why the openjdk-*-jdk packages always depend on the full
-jre and not the -jre-headless package. I understand on desktops it can
be beneficial to install the jdk and get the
6 matches
Mail list logo
