Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: jruby-openssl
Version : 0.9.7
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : https://github.com/jruby/jruby-openssl
* License : EPL-1.0/GPL-2/LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Java/Ruby
Description
On 28 May 2015, at 12:06 am, tony mancill wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 15:56:44 -0500 Brandon Bradley
> wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Owner: Brandon Bradley
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> * Package name: kafka
>> Version : 0.8.2.1
>> * URL : http://www.example.org/
>> * Li
On 05/27/2015 03:41 PM, Jan Henke wrote:
> Am 27.05.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
>> On Wed, 27 May 2015, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>
>>> I know, there at least we need to kill gcj support. But until then. Or
>>> we decide we don't care ab out 1.5/gcj now. Explicitely.
>>
>> On Wed, 27 May 20
Am 27.05.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 27/05/2015 15:41, Jan Henke a écrit :
>
>> I think gcj serves one single purpose only at this point in time:
>> Bootstrapping during the OpenJDK build.
> This is no longer true with OpenJDK 8 unfortunately, Java 7 is now required.
>
>
You can stil
On Thu, 21 May 2015 15:56:44 -0500 Brandon Bradley
wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Brandon Bradley
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: kafka
> Version : 0.8.2.1
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> * License : Apache 2.0
> Programming Lang: Java, Scala
>
Le 27/05/2015 15:41, Jan Henke a écrit :
> I think gcj serves one single purpose only at this point in time:
> Bootstrapping during the OpenJDK build.
This is no longer true with OpenJDK 8 unfortunately, Java 7 is now required.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Am 27.05.2015 um 15:04 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
> On Wed, 27 May 2015, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>> I know, there at least we need to kill gcj support. But until then. Or
>> we decide we don't care ab out 1.5/gcj now. Explicitely.
>
> On Wed, 27 May 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> Niels and Emmanue
On Wed, 27 May 2015, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I know, there at least we need to kill gcj support. But until then. Or
> we decide we don't care ab out 1.5/gcj now. Explicitely.
On Wed, 27 May 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Niels and Emmanuel have already pointed out the most important facts why
>
On 27.05.2015 11:41, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:45:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 26/05/2015 16:52, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
>>
>>> I think we should decide what our Java baseline is and how it affects
>>> release archs_before_ changing this.
I think changing the L
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:45:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 26/05/2015 16:52, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
>
> > I think we should decide what our Java baseline is and how it affects
> > release archs_before_ changing this.
>
> The best we can do I think is to identify the applications that
10 matches
Mail list logo