Re: Jessie release notes for the Java packages

2015-04-09 Thread Markus Koschany
On 08.04.2015 16:43, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 15:35:59 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> On 07.04.2015 23:45, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: But perhaps then it just ends up looking like a list. The statistics suggested by Markus might be more compact. (# of new, % updated,

Re: RFS: jnr-ffi, jnr-enxio and jnr-unixsocket

2015-04-09 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 03:17:12 +, Tim Potter escribió: > [...] > > Done - I updated d/copyright and also submitted a patch to upstream > adding them where missing. I just uploaded the package. I added another missing snippet to d/copyright file. There were some .java files from Guava project. T

Re: Re: RFS: new upstream version (3.0.10) of jnr-posix

2015-04-09 Thread tony mancill
> On 04/06/2015 09:39 PM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: >> Next on the list of Jruby dependencies is an updated version (3.0.10) >> of the jnr-posix library. The current version in the archive is >> out-of-date (1.1.8) and requires libconstantine-java which conflicts >> with any package that

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates (Was: Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie)

2015-04-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, Niels Thykier wrote: > * There are several jenkins-* packages that will (presumably) need to >be updated as often as Jenkins itself. I wondered which packages were "jenkins*" and figured it out with the help from Adam: holger@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn jenkins Wil

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates

2015-04-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 09/04/2015 10:10, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : > Of course this only works as long as no new dependencies are pulled in, > or at least stay at something managable. Jenkins upgrades have been accompanied by new dependencies in the past, the upstream developers often refactor the code and split so

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates

2015-04-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2015-04-09 9:10, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: [...] So it looks to me like we currently miss a place to offer a package like Jenkins to stable users, but it would be nice to have one as I believe there will be more packages in this situation in the future (even though we might not like this). I

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates

2015-04-09 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, "Adam D. Barratt" writes: > On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 23:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote: >> > Do you think is feasible or acceptable to maintain Jenkins in >> > jessie-updates suite instead? >> >> I am not entirely convinced that Jenkins applies to s