On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:48:29AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> Hi everyone. I’ve finally beat the packaging bug I had for the latest
> version of jffi. Just wondering what to do with it next - should I
> just splat it on top of the existing jffi version (1.0.2 - very old).
> The
Hi everyone. I’ve finally beat the packaging bug I had for the latest version
of jffi. Just wondering what to do with it next - should I just splat it on
top of the existing jffi version (1.0.2 - very old). The jffi package is a
dependency for a handful of jnr-* packages required by the late
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: invokebinder
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Charles Oliver Nutter
* URL : https://github.com/headius/invokebinder
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: libcoro-mock-java
Version : 1.1-SNAPSHOT
Upstream Author : Charles Oliver Nutter
* URL : https://github.com/headius/coro-mock
* License : Public domain
Programming Lang: Java
Descripti
On 01/22/2015 02:23 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
>>>
>>> How do
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>>> That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
>>> own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
>>
>>How do automated builds factor into that?
>
> I don't thi
>On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
>> own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
>
>How do automated builds factor into that?
I don't think it makes any difference. But IANAL, and you'd have to
read
7 matches
Mail list logo
