On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
> own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
How do automated builds factor into that?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On 19/01/15 11:35, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I've requested an access to the TCK for Java 8 in June to
> run it on the Debian packages but I haven't heard back from Oracle yet.
I'd ping them again.
Andrew.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On 19/01/15 00:20, Paul Wise wrote:
> If there are individuals who have access to the TCK and could
> validate the package and file bugs, that would be great.
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
Andrew.
--
To UNSU
Le 19/01/2015 01:20, Paul Wise a écrit :
> The actual version is 8u40~b09-1, which means Debian revision 1 of
> beta 9 of 8u40. It sounds like he misinterpreted this version. Perhaps
> expanding the b to beta would help here?
'b' stands for 'build' here, not 'beta'. A new OpenJDK build is tagged
Hi Jonathan,
Le 18/01/2015 23:21, Jonathan Yu a écrit :
> I wonder if there's anything that can (or should) be done to address
> Gil's criticisms. I love Debian and would always prefer to install
> things via apt-get from the official repositories rather than
> download/install third-party packag
5 matches
Mail list logo
