Re: RFS: clojure1.2/1.2.1+dfsg-5

2014-05-02 Thread tony mancill
On 05/02/2014 12:57 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > I fixed the RC bugs affecting the clojure1.2 package and I'm looking for > a sponsor to upload it. > > Here is the changelog: > > * Fixed the test failures with Java 7 (Closes: #717015) > * debian/control: > - Build depend on de

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread tony mancill
On 05/02/2014 02:56 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 02/05/2014 16:18, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > >> And there are a few build dependencies left on openjdk-6-jdk: >> >> - java-access-bridge > > I'm unable to find any dependency left on libaccess-bridge-java (there > is just a suggested dependency o

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/05/2014 22:25, Felix Natter a écrit : > Thus, after extracting openjdk-8_8u5-b13.orig.tar.gz in . (the directory > containing 'debian'), I had to move its contents (two tarballs) from > ./openjdk8 to . [1] > --> maybe this should be mentioned in README.source? I didn't document this step b

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/05/2014 16:18, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > And there are a few build dependencies left on openjdk-6-jdk: > > - java-access-bridge I'm unable to find any dependency left on libaccess-bridge-java (there is just a suggested dependency on libaccess-bridge-java-jni from omegat). java-access-brid

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread Felix Natter
Emmanuel Bourg writes: > Hi Felix, hello Emmanuel, > Thank you for giving a try. > > Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit : > >> I am having a small issue with the current git version: >> If I download via "debian/rules get-orig-source", and then >> "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc" I get: >> >

RFS: clojure1.2/1.2.1+dfsg-5

2014-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I fixed the RC bugs affecting the clojure1.2 package and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. Here is the changelog: * Fixed the test failures with Java 7 (Closes: #717015) * debian/control: - Build depend on default-jdk instead of openjdk-6-jdk - Standards-Version updated

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/05/2014 20:18, Felix Natter a écrit : > Does that mean that you intend to ship openjdk-7 xor openjdk-8 in > jessie? I think it would be good to keep openjdk-7 in case there are > problems (like rendering problems [1]) with openjdk-8. openjdk-8 build depends on openjdk-7 so it can't go away

Openjdk-7-jre: was: Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 02/05/2014 20:18, Felix Natter wrote: > > BTW: my package jmapviewer still Depends: on openjdk-7-jre. This should > soon be changed to default-jre, right? (I _think_ David wants to package > 1.03 anyway...). > Right! Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread Felix Natter
Matthias Klose writes: > Am 02.05.2014 06:36, schrieb tony mancill: >> On 05/01/2014 10:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>> Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit : >> Another question: Is it sufficient to point "update-java-alternatives" to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and r

Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

2014-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/05/2014 15:29, Matthias Klose a écrit : > I didn't say that I won't use his work. And yes, it's a waste of my time to > start this work within a new vcs which is neither used by upstream or the > current maintainers. I'd like to thank you for accepting to pursue the work on Alioth. I unders

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/05/2014 15:11, Matthias Klose a écrit : > The first priority should be to ship with only one version of OpenJDK. I have just fixed visualvm which was one of the remaining packages depending on openjdk-6. We are down to two bugs preventing the removal: https://bugs.debian.org/727805 (rjav

Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

2014-05-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 02.05.2014 15:19, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: > On 02/05/2014 15:14, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Am 02.05.2014 12:40, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a >>> sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the packag

Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

2014-05-02 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 02/05/2014 15:14, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 02.05.2014 12:40, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >> Hi all, >> >> Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a >> sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the package >> is already usable to work on the Java 8 transiti

Re: RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

2014-05-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 02.05.2014 12:40, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi all, > > Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a > sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the package > is already usable to work on the Java 8 transition. Please don't sponsor this package. I'm prep

Re: openjdk-8 package available for review

2014-05-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 02.05.2014 06:36, schrieb tony mancill: > On 05/01/2014 10:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit : > >>> Another question: Is it sufficient to point "update-java-alternatives" >>> to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and run subsequent packages >>> (tha

RFS: openjdk-8/8u5-b13-1 (NEW)

2014-05-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, Here we go, I prepared the openjdk-8 package and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. There are several issues pending but the package is already usable to work on the Java 8 transition. Here is the changelog: * Initial OpenJDK 8 package derived from the OpenJDK 7 package (Close