On 02/05/2014 08:40, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 02/05/2014 06:36, tony mancill a écrit :
>
>> Given that we're 6 months from the freeze, and just 4 months from the
>> deadline for any new transitions [1], is it reasonable to target
>> uploading a new java-common to experimental that depends on ope
Le 02/05/2014 06:36, tony mancill a écrit :
> Given that we're 6 months from the freeze, and just 4 months from the
> deadline for any new transitions [1], is it reasonable to target
> uploading a new java-common to experimental that depends on openjdk-8 in
> the next month or so?
Why not, but wi
On 05/01/2014 10:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit :
>> Another question: Is it sufficient to point "update-java-alternatives"
>> to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and run subsequent packages
>> (that build-depend on default-jdk and depend on default-j
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 08:15:24PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:32:36AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I updated the tomcat8 package to the latest upstream release and I'm
> > looking for a sponsor to upload it.
>
> I'll take care of it.
Done. Uplo
Hi Felix,
Thank you for giving a try.
Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit :
> I am having a small issue with the current git version:
> If I download via "debian/rules get-orig-source", and then
> "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc" I get:
>
> Extracting the sources...
> tar -xf jdk8u-*.tar.xz
>
Emmanuel Bourg writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have completed the first steps to package OpenJDK 8 and it's now
> possible to play with the package. I have uploaded amd64 binaries for
> those interested in testing this quickly:
>
> http://87.98.165.193/debian
>
> The source package is available on al
6 matches
Mail list logo
