Moving some Java packages from Debian Med to Debian Java

2014-04-17 Thread Andreas Tille
[Please CC me - I'm not subscribed] Hi, recently there was some discussion about Java packages maintained by Debian Med team as preconditions for some medical / biological applications. It seems to be reasonable to move them to the Java team to better cope with global changes to enable easear tr

Re: RFS: jajuk/1:1.9.6-8 - [UPLOADED]

2014-04-17 Thread tony mancill
On 04/17/2014 07:40 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:> Hi all, > > I updated the jajuk package to build with Java 8 and I'm looking for a > sponsor to upload it. Uploaded and tagged in svn. tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: jenkins-winstone/0.9.10-jenkins-47+dfsg-2 - [UPLOADED]

2014-04-17 Thread tony mancill
On 04/16/2014 11:47 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 17/04/2014 06:43, tony mancill a écrit : > >> Thanks for the update. Uploaded. > > Thank you! > > >> Since you're doing a lot work with Java 8, perhaps you could point out >> the common porting issues as you encounter them, and then we could >

Re: Groovy fails with groovy.lang.MissingMethodException

2014-04-17 Thread Stephen Nelson
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > Hi Bálint, > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:51:38AM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> > >> > Sorry I can't be more useful for this bug at this moment. > If I uploaded groovy 2.2.1 to unstable now I would break gradle and > groovy itself by caus

Re: Groovy fails with groovy.lang.MissingMethodException

2014-04-17 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Hi Bálint, On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:51:38AM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > > > > Sorry I can't be more useful for this bug at this moment. > I tried building groovy 2.2.1 on testing and it failed, too. I agree > that 2.x is the way to go and I think you could find a state of sid on > snapshots.de

Bug#745100: zeroc-ice: FTBFS with Java 8: name clash: remove(K,V) in MultiHashMap and remove(Object,Object) in HashMap have the same erasure

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: zeroc-ice Version: 3.5.1-5.2 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/java/src/IceInternal/OutgoingConnec

Bug#745099: openmama: FTBFS with Java 8: class MamdaLock is public, should be declared in a file named MamdaLock.java

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: openmama Version: 2.2.2.1-10 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: compile.locks: [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/mamda/j

Bug#745098: rjava: FTBFS with Java 8: configure: error: Cannot compile a simple JNI program

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: rjava Version: 0.9-6-1 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: checking for gcc... gcc -std=gnu99 checking whether

Bug#745097: mkgmap: FTBFS with Java 8: name clash: remove(K,V) in MultiHashMap and remove(Object,Object) in HashMap have the same erasure

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: mkgmap Version: 0.0.0+svn2981-1 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: compile: [javac] Compiling 477 source file

Bug#745091: jing-trang: FTBFS with Java 8: ServiceConfigurationError: Illegal configuration-file syntax

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: jing-trang Version: 20131210+dfsg+1-1 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: BUILD FAILED /«BUILDDIR»/jing-trang-201

Bug#745090: jitsi: FTBFS with Java 8: remove(Object,Object) in MultiMap clashes with remove(Object,Object) in Map

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: jitsi Version: 2.4.4997-1 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: [jain-javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/lib/src/jsip/src/gov/nis

Bug#745088: caveconverter: FTBFS with Java 8: Test cavesurvey.regression.PocketTopoToSurvexTest failed

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: caveconverter Version: 0~20131117~beta-2 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: test.all: [junit] Running caves

Bug#745085: biojava3-live: FTBFS with Java 8: NullPointerException at java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableCollection.(Collections.java:1086)

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: biojava3-live Version: 3.0.7+dfsg-1 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: [junit] Testcase: testParseHeader took

Re: Bug#745080: cadencii: FTBFS with Java 8: reference to Base64 is ambiguous

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 17/04/2014 22:33, David Gerard a écrit : > A question: How feasible is it for us regular users to help you check > this stuff? What Debian would be suitable, how to get Java 8 on, etc., > etc.? > > (I ask as a regular user who needs activemq, which didn't even work > properly with Java 7 until

Re: Bug#745080: cadencii: FTBFS with Java 8: reference to Base64 is ambiguous

2014-04-17 Thread David Gerard
On 17 April 2014 21:24, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Source: cadencii > Version: 3.3.9+svn20110818.r1732-2 > Severity: important > User: debian-java@lists.debian.org > Usertags: openjdk-8-transition A question: How feasible is it for us regular users to help you check this stuff? What Debian would b

Bug#745080: cadencii: FTBFS with Java 8: reference to Base64 is ambiguous

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: cadencii Version: 3.3.9+svn20110818.r1732-2 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: ./build/java/org/kbinani/cadencii/

Bug#745074: gdcm: FTBFS with Java 8: regex not supported: openjdk version "1.8.0"

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: gdcm Version: 2.4.1-2 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition Hi, During a rebuild of all Java packages in sid with OpenJDK 8, your package failed to build with the following error: -- Looking for stdlib.h - found -- Found Doxygen: /usr/

Re: [pkg-java] r17727 - in trunk/jalview/debian: . patches wrappers

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/02/2014 17:05, Timothy Booth a écrit : > Log: > Jalview 2.8. Note new dependencies needed for this version will be committed > soon. > This package was made on Ubuntu LTS so probably needs tweaking for Debian. Hi Tim, Did you make some progress on packaging the missing dependencies for J

RFS: jajuk/1:1.9.6-8

2014-04-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I updated the jajuk package to build with Java 8 and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. Here is the changelog: * Patched the build script to recognize Java 8 * Changed the dependency on mplayer to mplayer2 * Switch to debhelper level 9 * debian/control: Fixed the Vcs-Svn URL