Re: cofoja vs libcofoja-java

2014-04-15 17:40 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille : > Hi Tony, > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:09:51PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > >> So if there are Debian Java team members who have some preference why > > >> not recommending this in a policy document? For people who are > seldomly > > >> touching Jav

Re: RFS: icu4j-4.4/4.4.2.2-2

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:54:11PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:21:31PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I fixed the icu4j-4.4 package to build with Java 8 and I'm looking for a > > sponsor to upload it. > > I'll take care of it. Done. Uploaded. --

Re: RFS: ini4j/0.5.2-SNAPSHOT-4

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:52:40PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:16:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > I updated the ini4j package to fix a compilation failure with Java 8 [1] > > and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. This is yet another conflict > > with the n

Re: RFS: libasm4-java/5.0.1-1

nm, I forgot I had the upload rights on this one. Emmanuel Bourg Le 15/04/2014 16:29, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > Hi all, > > I updated the libasm4-java package to the latest upstream release and > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. This version of ASM is > compatible with Java 8. > > The n

Re: cofoja vs libcofoja-java

Hi Tony, On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:09:51PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > >> So if there are Debian Java team members who have some preference why > >> not recommending this in a policy document? For people who are seldomly > >> touching Java packages strict rules would be simply helpful. > > > >

RFS: libasm4-java/5.0.1-1

Hi all, I updated the libasm4-java package to the latest upstream release and I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. This version of ASM is compatible with Java 8. The new major versions of ASM are notoriously incompatible and so far we packaged them separately. The version 5 however remains com