Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please remove the collections15 package (binary package
libcollections15-java), this API was a fork of the Apache Commons
Collections API with generics and is now obsolete with the availability
of Apache Commons Collections 4 providing proper generic c
Le 10/04/2014 19:55, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
>
> Done. Uploaded.
Thank you Miguel, there is more to come :)
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.de
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:04:02PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:49:37AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> I'll take care of it.
Done. Uploaded.
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at
http://db.debian.org/fetc
> and we drop the package from Debian Med. Or even more simple: Emmanuel,
> if you would need to touch the package anyway just do your changes and
> we ask for removal of Dianes package.
That sounds like a good plan to me.
Maybe when the java-team version is updated in git Emmanuel can ping us
I also think that having OpenJDK 8 as the default would be preferable.
However fixing 80+ FTBFS bugs in time might be quite of a feat depending
on the type of the problem. I suggest to file bug reports for all those
bugs first. Severity important seems to be reasonable at the beginning.
If it turns
On 09/04/2014 05:55, tony mancill wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 05:40 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> OpenJDK 8 in Jessie is a must-have in my opinion, and we are now on
>>> track to provide a proper package.
>> Agree.
>>
>>> The question o
Le 10/04/2014 14:23, Eugene Zhukov a écrit :
.
> Isn't JavaFX supposed to be part of JDK 8?
JavaFX is part of Java 8, but not part of OpenJDK 8. It's under a
different upstream repository:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/master/rt/file/
We will probably have to package it separately.
Emman
Hello,
I cloned OpenJDK 8 repo from [0], downloaded source with
get-orig-source, built and installed the binaries.
Then I tried to compile (switched to new javac before, of course)
JavaFX "Hello World" application. Compilation fails with package
javafx.* does not exist...
Isn't JavaFX supposed to
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:40:43AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > BTW, is there some policy to name Java source packages? I personally
> > prefer the same source name as the binary name (as Diane did).
>
> There is a policy for the name of the binary packages, but nothing for
> the source
Le 10/04/2014 08:00, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> So you will file an RM bug to ftpmaster?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas (who had his share in this issue by sponsering the package)
>
> BTW, is there some policy to name Java source packages? I personally
> prefer the same source name as the b
10 matches
Mail list logo
