Hi,
On 25.3.2014 05:12, tony mancill wrote:
One thing that might cause an issue is that upstream is using SWT 4.2
whereas Debian has 3.8.2 in testing. I assume that upgrading will be a
big job?
SWT 4 is not such big a problem, package for 4.3 is almost done[1]; if there
is demand for having it
On 03/24/2014 08:54 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I updated the ca-certificates-java package to fix a build failure and
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. I also reorganized the sources,
> refactored the code and added some tests.
>
> Here is the changelog:
>
> * Fixed a test
On 03/23/2014 02:18 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:02 PM, tony mancill wrote:
>> On 03/23/2014 10:05 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>> I don't know of a good Java UI package to use as an example, and I'm not
>> sure that you really need one. The difficulty with Azureus/Vuze (tha
Le 23/03/2014 22:12, Tim Retout a écrit :
> What's the right thing to do when Java packages can only build against
> openjdk-7-jdk, and not gcj?
Hi Tim,
gcj is stuck with Java 5 and no longer supported upstream. It's nice if
a package still works with gcj, but it wouldn't be reasonable to invest
Hello security team,
I have prepared a new version of libspring-java to fix CVE-2014-0054
and CVE-2014-1904 (#741604) by backporting the corresponding upstream
commits. Please find attached the debdiff against the last version of
libspring-java in stable-security.
Please let me know if the change
Hi all,
I updated the ca-certificates-java package to fix a build failure and
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. I also reorganized the sources,
refactored the code and added some tests.
Here is the changelog:
* Fixed a test failure caused by the removal of the CAcert.org root
certifi
Hi all,
I prepared a new version of java-package and I'm looking for a sponsor
to upload it.
Here is the changelog:
* Added support for ARM VFP/hard-float JDK releases.
Thanks to Christopher Huhn (Closes: #724455)
* Added more command line tool alternatives: jcmd, jdeps, jhat,
jrunscrip
Hi Tony,
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 09:49:02AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
[..snip..]
> My concern is not that we don't have the proper channels through which
> to deliver, but that each means another release to support. In this
> model we have (at a minimum) unstable, stable-security (which requires
8 matches
Mail list logo