On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 23.03.2014 18:05, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>
> freemind, freeplane or freecol are like azureus CDBS based, so I suggest
> to take a look at those packages first. If you want to try out dh +
> javahelper, I recommend triplea or mediathekview
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:02 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> On 03/23/2014 10:05 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I don't know of a good Java UI package to use as an example, and I'm not
> sure that you really need one. The difficulty with Azureus/Vuze (that
> kept from uploading 4.8.0 in December of 2012 -
Hi all,
What's the right thing to do when Java packages can only build against
openjdk-7-jdk, and not gcj?
Since the latest default-jdk upload, zookeeper now fails to build on
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 and sparc:
https://bugs.debian.org/742405
I guess fixing it to build with gcj will be quit
On 03/23/2014 10:05 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I had a look at packaging the latest release of Azureus/Vuze and have
> managed to get the app working without too many issues. Some bugs
> against the package indicate the current packaging isn't up to scratch.
>
> I've not worked on p
Hi Stephen,
On 23.03.2014 18:05, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I had a look at packaging the latest release of Azureus/Vuze and have
> managed to get the app working without too many issues. Some bugs
> against the package indicate the current packaging isn't up to scratch.
>
> I've not w
Hi team,
I had a look at packaging the latest release of Azureus/Vuze and have
managed to get the app working without too many issues. Some bugs against
the package indicate the current packaging isn't up to scratch.
I've not worked on packaging a Java application that has a UI, so I was
wonderin
On 03/23/2014 02:20 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 09:43:48PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> [..snip..]
>> In any event, I can sympathize and am glad that you're opening the
>> discussion. Not everything is going to fit the "stable" distribution
>> model - sometimes y
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 09:11:05PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
>
> Thanks for getting this ready for Debian!
> tony
>
Hi guys, thanks for taking care of this new package.
Cheers,
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at
http://db.debian.o
Hi Tony,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 09:43:48PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
[..snip..]
> In any event, I can sympathize and am glad that you're opening the
> discussion. Not everything is going to fit the "stable" distribution
> model - sometimes you need the "freshest bits."
We do have stable-backpo
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:37:34PM +, James Page wrote:
[..snip..]
> I'm also concerned about where Jenkins could be realistically
> maintained in a stable Debian; Upstream move fast (LTS release every 3
> months) and I've found that unless you understand the inside of
> Kohsuke's mind, tryin
10 matches
Mail list logo
