On 24.01.2014 23:28, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 24/01/2014 20:15, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
>
>> Now, I could have just put a line like
>>
>> Maintainer: Debian Java maintainers
>>
>>
>> into the debian/control files and could have just uploaded the packages
>> after posting quick ITPs with a p
Hi all,
two new security flaws were discovered in the Spring framework and bug
#735420 was filed. Both affect us. See also
http://www.gopivotal.com/security/cve-2013-6429
http://www.gopivotal.com/security/cve-2013-6430
I have created two patches based on these upstream commits:
CVE-2013-6430
==
Le 24/01/2014 20:15, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
> Now, I could have just put a line like
>
> Maintainer: Debian Java maintainers
>
>
> into the debian/control files and could have just uploaded the packages
> after posting quick ITPs with a plan to immediately forget about the
> packages, but
* Sylvestre Ledru:
> Just to make sure I understand, you did the proof of concept but you
> are not planning to go forward.
I see most of the listed packages as means to an end: a working ES
package that can be built from sources without having to deal with the
Maven-specific assumptions that are
Hello
Congratulations!
On 23/01/2014 15:43, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> As a first step, I am going to document the various required
> dependencies in the form of RFP bugs that are going to be linked to this
> bug (#660826: RFP Elasticsearch) and I will try to make my efforts
> available through git re
Le 23/01/2014 03:20, tony mancill a écrit :
> Yes, I believe so. I will paste the email exchange into
> debian/copyright and upload to NEW.
>
> Thank you for following up on this.
> tony
Thank you Tony. For the record the missing headers have just been added
upstream.
https://github.com/hunter
6 matches
Mail list logo
