On 01/21/2014 03:35 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the latest update of
> plexus-compiler. This update fixes a warning when building Maven based
> packages:
>
> [WARNING] POM for
> 'org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-compiler-api:pom:debian:runtime' is invalid
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the latest update of
plexus-compiler. This update fixes a warning when building Maven based
packages:
[WARNING] POM for
'org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-compiler-api:pom:debian:runtime' is invalid.
This is caused by a non versioned dependency in the poms, t
On 21/01/14 11:27, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/01/2014 11:09, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>
>> When you say creating separate binary packages, do you mean creating
>> packages that have the version in the name such as
>>
>> libbcprov1.49-java.deb(1.49)
>>
>> libbcprov-java.deb (existing 1.44
> Jitsi doesn't have a versioned dependency on this so it would hopefully
> be happy with the 1.44 version though and I think that would look better
> than having libbcprov1.49-java packages floating about.
Then this should get versioned, we definitely fail to compile with older
versions. The only
Le 21/01/2014 11:09, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
> When you say creating separate binary packages, do you mean creating
> packages that have the version in the name such as
>
> libbcprov1.49-java.deb(1.49)
>
> libbcprov-java.deb (existing 1.44 in wheezy)
Yes exactly. And the package would
On 20/01/14 13:14, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Backporting bouncycastle to wheezy is going to cause a lot of troubles
> because the version 1.49 breaks a lot of reverse dependencies. See
> #687694 for a glimpse of the work that was involved in the transition to
> this new version.
>
> A
6 matches
Mail list logo