Re: RFS: eclipse-mylyn 3.10.0-1

2013-11-14 Thread tony mancill
On 11/14/2013 09:11 AM, Jakub Adam wrote: > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for new upstream release of package > "eclipse-mylyn". > > * Package name: eclipse-mylyn >Version : 3.10.0-1 >Upstream Author : Eclipse Mylyn Project > * URL : http://

Re: openjdk-7 for kfreebsd

2013-11-14 Thread Robert Millan
On 14/11/2013 12:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > -#ifdef __linux__ > +#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__GLIBC__) > > We have dozens of these for example - that kind of ifdef is ambiguous as > to whether it expects "the Linux kernel" or just "a Linux-like userland" > which is true also of GNU/kFr

RFS: eclipse-mylyn 3.10.0-1

2013-11-14 Thread Jakub Adam
Dear java packagers, I am looking for a sponsor for new upstream release of package "eclipse-mylyn". * Package name: eclipse-mylyn Version : 3.10.0-1 Upstream Author : Eclipse Mylyn Project * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/mylyn * License : EPL-1.0 Secti

Re: Renaming artifactId to avoid file conflicts

2013-11-14 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 14/11/2013 17:16, Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza a écrit : > The jline and jline2 packages seem to be in conflict because both > packages create the same artifact(jline.jar) and store their pom file in > the same location under the same name in the maven repo. Hi Eugenio, The common solution in

Renaming artifactId to avoid file conflicts

2013-11-14 Thread Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza
Hello, The jline and jline2 packages seem to be in conflict because both packages create the same artifact(jline.jar) and store their pom file in the same location under the same name in the maven repo. Would it be feasible to rename the artifactId of jline2 from 'jline' to 'jline2'? Will it be a

Re: openjdk-7 for kfreebsd

2013-11-14 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/14/2013 11:53 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 14/11/13 09:26, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> [...] on kfreebsd we are also looking to switch to openjdk-7 as >>> soon as possible. And we were advised to send our patches >>> upstream also. I'd appreciate any advice on how to go ab

default-java and openjdk-7 on sparc

2013-11-14 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-11-09 14:35, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > (With my Java hat on and my Release hat off) > > We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and > testing. However, there is major blocker, which is java-common itself > (and its default-* binaries). mips and mipsel are th

Re: openjdk-7 for kfreebsd

2013-11-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi Andrew, On 14/11/13 09:26, Andrew Haley wrote: >> [...] on kfreebsd we are also looking to switch to openjdk-7 as soon as >> possible. And we were advised to send our patches upstream also. I'd >> appreciate any advice on how to go about doing that. > > Talk to me. Thank you! Debian appl

Re: openjdk-7 for kfreebsd

2013-11-14 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/13/2013 07:45 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> On 11/13/2013 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> I have finally been able to fix openjdk-7 on mips and mipsel. > > Brilliant! > > On 13/11/13 09:10, Andrew Haley wrote: >> That's an odd patch. > > FWIW it looks right to me that something like

Re: tomcat8 review

2013-11-14 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 14/11/2013 10:09, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I intend to upload 3.2 to experimental this weekend. Emmanuel has > already fixed two of the three issues that prevent an upload to > unstable. Once those three packages get uploaded, EasyMock 3.2 can be > uploaded to unstable, too. Thank you Marku

Re: tomcat8 review

2013-11-14 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, On Sun, 10. Nov 18:29 Emmanuel Bourg wrote: [...] > > Do we need to package the newer version of easymock? > > Yes, easymock 3.2 I intend to upload 3.2 to experimental this weekend. Emmanuel has already fixed two of the three issues that prevent an upload to unstable. Once those three packag